Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which of these stat lines is better?


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

Obviously Allen’s is better but it’s really pointless to compare the two, the teams around them were completely different, the opponents were completely different, the overall situations were completely different and it’s a tiny sample size. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, GOOGLE JIM BOB COOTER said:

QB A: 72 of 118 (61.0% completion), 1,033 yards, 3 TDs, 5 interceptions; 23 rushes for 100 yards, 4 TDs, 2 fumbles, 0-3

QB B: 49 of 79 (62% completion), 564 yards, 3 TDs, 2 interceptions; 3 rushes for 5 yards, 2-1

2-1 beats 0-3 every time. matt moore owns

Haha...decent post 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Bartin said:

QB B is actually...Cam Newton's first three road starts”

The two games you cited were home games so they wouldn’t be a part of the stat the OP put up.

Oh, gotcha.

Makes this thread even more pointless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well since wins are a team stat not an individual player’s stat you can drop that from the comparison. It’s close. I’ll take an interception over a lost fumble since an interception usually puts them much further down the field.
 

Hard to really compare since one had only one WR that should even be in the NFL and an ok defense and the other has a comparatively stacked supporting offensive cast and a defense playing lights out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, EgoDogg said:

Look at the teams around those players, too.

2011 was right after going 2-14. Legedu Naanee was also our #2 receiver. This thread is one of the most cherry-picked threads I've seen.

Not really. I'm not saying Kyle Allen is better than Cam, no one is. Only insecure Cam fanboys are thinking other people are saying that. I'm just sick of people saying Kyle Allen is just Matt Moore when eyeball test and his stats show he's clearly much more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, GOOGLE JIM BOB COOTER said:

chris weinke went 1-2 in his first 3 games. the record speaks for itself. 1-2 > 0-3 and let me tell you something those records sure were reflective of individual impact and predictive of future success/failure

Another insecure child. No one is saying Kyle Allen is having a better start to his career than Cam Newton. Just that the insecure Camboys that are trying to poo-poo Kyle Allen's stats should see they compare very favorably to Cam's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

Not really. I'm not saying Kyle Allen is better than Cam, no one is. Only insecure Cam fanboys are thinking other people are saying that. I'm just sick of people saying Kyle Allen is just Matt Moore when eyeball test and his stats show he's clearly much more.

The truth is you can't anoint him or crucify him after 3 starts. He's done everything you can ask for him as a passer filling in for Cam. He hasn't made any bad decisions throwing and his biggest issue is fumbling, which can be corrected a lot easier than reading defenses. I'm saying just because he had more success (with a better supporting cast) than Cam did in his first 3 road starts doesn't mean squat for what type of player he'll be long-term, and as more tape is available.

I don't think this needs saying, but I will anyways. I absolutely love being confident in having a backup like Kyle Allen. I haven't had faith in a backup QB coming in the game for a LONG time. I don't have an opinion on how he'll be long term. I'm not saying he'll be the next Brady or the next Weinke. He's going to be the next Kyle Allen, and it's very promising what he's shown so far. But I stand by my initial statement that those comparisons don't mean anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

Not really. I'm not saying Kyle Allen is better than Cam, no one is. Only insecure Cam fanboys are thinking other people are saying that. I'm just sick of people saying Kyle Allen is just Matt Moore when eyeball test and his stats show he's clearly much more.

I mean....for calling out "insecure Cam fanboys"......you did start this thread, correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’ve haven’t seen anything that says we have interest in Njoku?
    • I think the Njoku interest revealed intent and the type of TE they want.  I really expected more from Sanders.
    • Defensive tackle (or end in a 3-4 base) is suddenly a rather significant need.  It seems to be a forbidden topic on the Huddle.  Well I am going to unforbidden it for this thread. When we lost Robinson, it was a salary cap cutting move, saving us about $9m or so, I think.  That suggests that we are going to get cheaper, younger, and maybe, more multi-dimensional.  First, what did we lose in Robinson: (Charlotte Observer)  "Robinson co-led the team in sacks (5.5) in 2024, and he ranked second among Carolina linemen, behind Brown, in sacks (2.5) in 2025. (Derrick) Brown played on 76.4% of the Panthers’ defensive snaps last year, while Robinson played on 62.2% of those reps. No other defensive lineman played more than 38.3%, as free-agent addition, Turk Wharton, dealt with injuries throughout his first season in Carolina. Wharton played in just nine games, producing 36 total tackles and two sacks. He’s guaranteed $14 million this upcoming season. Read more at: https://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article314544998.html#storylink=cpy OK, about Turk Wharton.  The Observer claims that he and Bobby Brown III were to rotate into the Robinson DE position, but that is too weird for my head to comprehend.  First, Brown III is a NT by trade and Wharton weighs about 280 lbs and is not stout vs. the run.  Brown III is not going to provide the internal pass pressure; he is basically designed to take on double teams and dig in.  Wharton, on the other hand, had a PFF score in those 9 games of 40 or so.  In fairness, he was playing with injuries, but Damn.  PFF gives me a higher rating at the Golden Corral buffet.  In other words, we need a true DT who can fill the two thirds of snaps that we just released.  We can't count on Turk and Brown III is not the answer.  Cam Jackson?  Same as Brown.  Have your people do what they do best.  Furthermore, Derrick Brown probably should limit his snaps.  Playing more than 3/4 of the snaps is hard on the body.  A tired player in the trenches is more prone to lower-body injuries. We need a player who can give Derrick Brown some relief and play opposite him as well.  Turk can rotate in but he needs to shoot gaps and give Guards and tackles fits--a change of pace.   I have to think we are going to draft DT much sooner than most Huddlers realize.  My favorite, you didn't ask? Probable second-rounder Gracen Halton (No. 59 overall, according to ESPN's March 2026 update). Once considered a Day 3 sleeper, his 2026 NFL draft stock has exploded into Round 2 or 3 due to elite interior pass-rush metrics.  Projected Round: 2 (Early to Mid) Key Traits: Elite explosive, quickness, 12.2%+ pass-rush win rate, and positional versatility to play inside on passing downs. Combine Highlights: Led defensive tackles in the vertical jump (36.5”) and broad jump, per Sports Illustrated. Draft Stock: Rising fast due to consistent 2025 production (7 tackles for loss) and a "freak show" combine performance, according to Stormin in Norman.  Halton is considered a high-motor playmaker and a potential Day 2 standout, notes   I would not be surprised to see DT on day 2.  
×
×
  • Create New...