Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

4-1 Record, 8 TDs, 2 INTs...Matt Moore Ladies & Gentlemen


saX man

Recommended Posts

A bit of perspective in here, but honest, I'm not trying to make this a "see, Allen sucks!" thread...

Game 1: 14/20 161 Yards, O TDs, 1 INT (Win)

Game 2: 15/30 197 Yards, 1 TD, O INT (Loss)

Game 3: 21/33 299 Yards, 3 TDs, 2 Fumbles (Win, Primetime)

Game 4: 15/20 171 Yards, 3 TDS (Win)

Game 5: 14/23 162 Yards, 1 TD, O INTs

This is Matt Moore when we were convinced he was Jake's successor.  I think I have a fair memory of his play and it was solid, remember some bad throws that were disasters avoided, but he did enough to let us win.  The next season, we ended up benching him for David freaking Carr. 

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/M/MoorMa01.htm

--

In comparison, we are all in clear mind of KA's work this season.  Overall, I think Allen has MUCH better accuracy, touch, and energizes the huddle a ton.  Not to mention, I think Moore has and will always have sloppy footwork.  His step back is JV.  If we're talking game manager, Moore was a classic game manager.  Thing was, he was super young and in a similar vein got everyone super excited because we all know we were at Jake's end.  So what am I getting at?

Saxy's Take:

Allen is a step above a Moore from what I've seen.  He has not been asked to go out and produce a game winning drive but he's winning, not having overtly sloppy performances, and after some early fumbles, clearly cleaned himself up.  When Cam is 130%, he goes back in, we play Allen until then.  If Cam plays a poor game, prepare yourselves for mayhem but I advise EXTREME caution with a young guy.  He's not doing anything next step and beyond that D Coordinators necessarily have to adjust to, but I'd be shortsighted to say he's not dropping dimes and executing the game plan really damn well.

This is SUPER generalized comparisons but I see more of a Matt Hasselback, Brad Johnson, Palmer, etc. than a McCoy, Fitzpatrick, Barkley.     

I give him a 7.8/10 so far.  Would rewatch.  Supporting cast is really awesome.  He carries it just enough.  He's WANG CHI from Big Trouble in Little China with Kuechly as Jack Burton.  

DSC03649.jpg

But don't you dare forget about Cam

Big-Trouble-5-615x259.jpg

big-trouble-little-china-james-hong-lo-p

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, hepcat said:

Matt Moore is still in the NFL

Yes.

I mean, the Nuggets need to have MPJ step up if they want to make it to at least where they were last year.  Murray-Harris is a solid backcourt.  Morris-Beasley a good rotation.  Jokic an MVP candidate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Forty-Eight said:

Whoever believed that Moore was Jake’s successor should feel embarrassed. Matt Moore sucked. 

He did not suck. He is still in the NFL and even started a playoff game for the Dolphins once. He was a good backup QB. Will Allen be that? Will he be more than that? We don’t know yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Moore was more like Jake.  I think that was always the Moore comparison.  Moore gambled like Jake did and just tossed it up.  Just wasn’t as good. 

Allen doesn’t play like either IMO. Allen if he gets the fumbles under control looks to be more of the true game manager in terms of play.   Seems to play much smarter and controlled 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Forty-Eight said:

Whoever believed that Moore was Jake’s successor should feel embarrassed. Matt Moore sucked. 

That would be the majority of the fan base headed into 2010.  That was simply the reality of it, particularly after the Vikings game.  I imagine you're about to take the stance that you knew he was poor all along but he's been a reasonable emergency starter for teams.  Don't be that guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First I think Allen has presented more touch on his passes and better ability to sustain drives than Moore ever did. He also distributes the ball better. 

Secondly. Just because Moore got benched didn't mean he deserved it.  Fox left him out to dry and put him on a short leash.  Moore was out playing Jake in 07. He outplayed Carr and Clausen. He never got a real shot here and his opportunity to be a starter was never in good faith here or in Miami. Dude never got the opportunity to grow as a player because the moment he struggled he was going to get benched for the draft pick. So you can say he wasn't good enough but we still won games and could have won a lot more with him in his time here.

Even if Allen is a Matt Moore, this team is good enough win 4 straight with him. Cam gets healthy and its a win win situation. Maybe Allen blossoms and becomes a badass you never know. It'll play itself out.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah the only way current set up is fun is if every year a different tiny school builds a super team and makes a run. You just need 1 rich guy to say you know what would be funny, if I drop 30 million and my school has a shot at a national championship.   They won't ever do it but put some sort of tiered salary cap in place and sign them to 4 year deals. You can only transfer up or down tiers no lateral moves because mean ole coach at texas doesn't play me enough so I'm going to Tennessee. So a player at prairie view can transfer to texas and get paid more or a player from UNC can transfer to UNCG because he isn't getting playing time. If a guy is transferring "up" he can get a salary bump if the team has salary cap space. A guy transferring down has to stay at the same salary as he signed his 4 year deal for so the lower tier team would have to have the cap space to sign him. It would stop the money chasing for lateral moves but allow guys who improve massively at lower schools to make more money as juniors and seniors and hopefully keep more guys in one place because the contract is for 4 years.
    • Bryce youngs first starts for 3 years   51 of 103 49%     153 yards avg 6 ints 2 tds   But this is the year he turns it around
    • His third year was worse than Bryce's third year, significantly so.  And he had a game where he threw for 120 yards, two inteceptions, and had a fumble.  He had multiple games where he threw for more int's than td's.  
×
×
  • Create New...