Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers claim RB Mike Davis


NYPantherFan

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, My Goodness My Guinness said:

YESSSS! I finally get a former Gamecock not named Damiere Byrd to cheer for!

On a serious note, this is a good pick up. He's got power but still has pass catching ability. Definitely an upgrade over Bonnafon.

Dennis Daley was a Gamecock..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

I can understand that, but again why bring somebody else in when we already have backs we aren't using?

Heck, how many runningbacks do we actually have on the roster now?

My theory is that Scarlett is in the doghouse. He was a headcase at UF and could still be that way now.

Bonnafon is a scrappy guy but really doesn't bring much to the table.

Mike Davis? There's a skillset that compliments CMC. Thunder to the lightening.

The thing is... we had that exact guy in CJA last year. Granted, there were rumors that his attitude was pretty piss poor, hence why he currently finds himself unemployed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TNPanther said:

My theory is that Scarlett is in the doghouse. He was a headcase at UF and could still be that way now.

Bonnafon is a scrappy guy but really doesn't bring much to the table.

Mike Davis? There's a skillset that compliments CMC. Thunder to the lightening.

The thing is... we had that exact guy in CJA last year. Granted, there were rumors that his attitude was pretty piss poor, hence why he currently finds himself unemployed.

Again, that's reasonable.

But why do it at the expense of Greg Dortch?

If you have a runningback that's in your dog house, cut him and put him on the practice squad. Or do that to the return guy that screwed up yesterday.

Just not making sense to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This play was never designed to go to either DJ or Odunze. The primary read is Burden who is stymied early, with the outlet being Kmet if Caleb doesn't like the option for Burden. Given the situation it's pretty obvious the simple play is to take the free yards with Kmet, or if you want to be aggressive just wait a beat longer for Burden to uncover on his double move. If Moore was ever going to be a viable target in this play then Caleb should have started out reading Odunze to hold the safety in the middle and then coming to Moore, but because he started the snap staring down the right and then came back to the middle late it made it where the safety's leverage remained to the outside of Moore, so he would never have imagined that pass actually being thrown to him in that situation. Realistically DJ's best option in that context is to just occupy the safety to leave a hole open for Caleb to get it to Burden, which is probably why he throttles down vs carrying the safety across.
    • Even with Sonny Styles still on the board I thought it's a no brainer to address the Oline after Icky's injury.  And how can you pass up Fano at 19 given our situation. Then the rest of the draft just kind of made sense with maybe the exception of Klubnik.  But if Canales can fix him and Young goes down. . .I think it's a solid pick. What do you think of this draft?
    • When we didn't trade him to the Rams or the Bears (I believe the Bears said they would take one of Brown/ Burns/DJ Moore) we should have just signed him and kept him.  We should have traded him to the Rams obviously and we should have kept DJ and traded Burns.  We made all three wrong choices with Burns lol.
×
×
  • Create New...