Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could we maybe just maybe be the 2011 Giants?


PanthersNC1984

Recommended Posts

So I was looking at the 2011 Giants season when they went 9-7 and won it all, I know I know, every single year there is one below average team who thinks they can be the 2011 Giants, but hear me out.

2011 Giants- Beat only one, yes just one team with a winning record all season, the Patriots.

2019 Panthers- Beat one, just one winning team so far, the Texans.

2011 Giants- 8 of their remaining wins came against bad teams that all had a losing record that year.

2019 Panthers- so far all the rest of Panther wins this year have been against bad teams with a losing record so far.

2011 Giants- Have one game where they get blown out and lose 49-24 against the Saints.

2019 Panthers- Had a blowout loss against the 49ers.

oh and FWIW Giants lose to the 15-1 Packers that year during the regular season only to come back and beat them in the playoffs that year. 

Bottom line is this, do NOT count us out yet. If Kyle Allen’s light switch goes on at just the perfect time and we get hot at just the right time, just like the Giants did, then watch out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11-5 might not get us in with tie breakers. There’s several teams ahead of us.

if we won out at 12-4 then we would get in, mostly because we would probably tie the Saints and be the division winner.

This isn’t a 12-4 team.

maybe 8-8 or 9-7 team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right. I didn’t think it was good either but the QB sure did. He was the defacto number one target, not Chark, was my point.
    • We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it.  This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment. I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now.  Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement.  Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work.  Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not.    Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out.  And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO.     
×
×
  • Create New...