Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Athletic Saints writer goes ballistic over PI call


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Jeff Duncan is a long time Saints beat writer who's now part of The Athletic's talent roster.

You might say he's a little displeased about the PI call reversal yesterday.

NFL replay protocol for pass interference is an embarrassment

Twelve weeks into the 100th season of NFL football, this much has become clear and obvious: The league’s new replay rule involving pass interference is a complete and utter debacle.

Amazingly, improbably, mindbogglingly, the NFL has somehow taken a bad situation and made it worse.

The league’s flawed new replay protocol for pass interference has become a weekly source of frustration for everyone involved: players, coaches, fans, media. No one knows what to expect from week to week, game to game, even play to play. With each passing week comes a new, mystifying decision or egregious gaffe.

And if something isn’t done to rectify the situation, the league is going to have a potentially bigger P.R. mess on its hands than it did last season after the NOLA No-Call.

The latest example occurred Sunday in the New Orleans Saints’ 34-31 victory against the Carolina Panthers, an exciting, hard-fought game between two division rivals that was marred by several questionable calls and questionable replay challenges.

Saints head coach Sean Payton and Panthers head coach Ron Rivera each challenged a pass interference call and non-call during the game. Payton’s challenge was denied; Rivera’s was upheld.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both those challenges had the correct outcome. Cook clearly extended his arm on the defender, that’s the definition of OPI. The other one was soft and wasn’t expected to be overturned based on other challenges so far this year but it was also clearly a PI on the defender, he obviously grabbed him with the ball in the air, even Romo admitted that and he was clearly rooting for the Aints to blow us out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If not for their psychotic head coach, there would’ve been no challenge opportunity in the first place for Rivera. So, maybe next time, don’t spend your entire off-season bitching and moaning for something that ends up biting you in the ass. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ellis said:

If not for their psychotic head coach, there would’ve been no challenge opportunity in the first place for Rivera. So, maybe next time, don’t spend your entire off-season bitching in moaning for something that ends up biting you in the ass. 

The pure definition of "irony".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, t96 said:

Both those challenges had the correct outcome. Cook clearly extended his arm on the defender, that’s the definition of OPI. The other one was soft and wasn’t expected to be overturned based on other challenges so far this year but it was also clearly a PI on the defender, he obviously grabbed him with the ball in the air, even Romo admitted that and he was clearly rooting for the Aints to blow us out.

Was he? I really didn't get that feeling at all. I thought he was very even-handed. I mean, he spent the entire second quarter blowing Kyle Allen, and making fun of Sean Payton for being a replacement player.

I actually thought Romo was one of the better color commentator's I've heard for a Panthers broadcast all year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it was fear of the unknown because he tried to hide the extent of the injuries that made him drop. After the drop, the reports I heard were that teams knew what was wrong with his knee and it was something similar to another athlete from a few years ago (honestly don't remember if it was even a football player).  That it was basically one of those things where he should be fine for a while, there isn't a huge concern of immediate injury risk.   But what he has going on with his knee is something that is degenerative and there's little chance he'll be able to play more than 5 or so years on it before he won't be able to play anymore. So basically it was teams knowing if they draft him, he's probably going to be only a rookie contract player and even if he's great, you might not be able to get use out of him on a second contract.  Which in turn makes the drop make sense, but I'm kinda surprised some contending team didn't take him late in the 1st, hoping he'd put them over the top on a SB run but then not even have to worry about giving him a big contract in 4 years too.
    • Depends if they see the writing on the wall with their roster and contracts and decide to bite the bullet and begin a complete rebuild and roster overhaul.  I have no clue why some franchises (IE us) refuse to do this and keep half assing trying to win 8 games or so.  Do it correctly, take your lumps and build a contender.  We shall see what loomis decides.
    • Each team plays 17 games.  I do not see why they don't just have each team play one international game per year.  Neutral site game, 8 home, 8 away.    
×
×
  • Create New...