Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Browns is McDaniels dream job.


Snake

Recommended Posts

It's being reported that McDaniels is likely to see the Browns as a dream job that he has wanted since he was a kid and they are willing to allow him to have whatever control he wants. 

With that coming out it seems we are not very high on his list unless we give him the same kind of control. What are you guys thoughts? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Snake said:

It's being reported that McDaniels is likely to see the Browns as a dream job that he has wanted since he was a kid and they are willing to allow him to have whatever control he wants. 

With that coming out it seems we are not very high on his list unless we give him the same kind of control. What are you guys thoughts? 

Sounds great! The guy sounds like the perfect addition to the mistake by the lake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tepper's Chest Hair said:

I am pretty sure its already been reported we are high on his list.  Its been reported he is most interested in Panthers and Browns.

Lol bc those are literally the only two teams out there that are able to give him full control

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Snake said:

It's being reported that McDaniels is likely to see the Browns as a dream job that he has wanted since he was a kid and they are willing to allow him to have whatever control he wants. 

With that coming out it seems we are not very high on his list unless we give him the same kind of control. What are you guys thoughts? 

Please Jeebus let McDorkface go somewhere else.

Literally anywhere.

I question the mental stability of anyone describing the Browns as their dream coaching job. But hey, go for it, as long as you're not our coach, I'm happy.

 

edit: oh look more pointless poo from the resident malcontent who's stunted emotional growth makes him irrationally dislike everything I say because he operates on a 3rd grade level. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 1of10Charnatives said:

Please Jeebus let McDorkface go somewhere else.

Literally anywhere.

I question the mental stability of anyone describing the Browns as their dream coaching job. But hey, go for it, as long as you're not our coach, I'm happy.

Man U corny 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also feel the "dream job" aspect of the Browns is more based on him growing up in the area.  Playing HS ball in the area, etc.  Local teams, especially of the team you were local as a kid/teenager/growing up often can take up a place in your heart regardless of how dysfunctional they may later turn.  

Of course he will talk big about any interview prospect he has lined up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...