Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Looks like Rhule may target Joe Brady for OC


jb2288

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Panfan35 said:

A healthy cam is better than any QB in this draft and if we trade a healthy cam it would be the Bengals giving up a couple of firsts or a first and a couple of 2nds 

This ignores that Cam is 31 and that how long he can stay healthy for is unknowable but questionable. Do not hold your breathe waiting for the Bengals to call with that offer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

This ignores that Cam is 31 and that how long he can stay healthy for is unknowable but questionable. Do not hold your breathe waiting for the Bengals to call with that offer.

Better than any options this draft. Might not be the case the next year. Getting a 1st next year would be ideal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

Better than any options this draft. Might not be the case the next year. Getting a 1st next year would be ideal.

Oh don’t get me wrong. Of all available options my preference would be for Cam to return and show out, however I hold no illusions about the way other teams will assess his value right now. I’d also rather have that 1st next year too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Cary Kollins said:

I've a weird feeling Tepper is either about to build the next great NFL dynasty or it's going to fail spectacularly. Either way I'm all here for it.


fwiw I guarantee financial gurus were saying similar stuff around the time Tepper was going against the grain in the stock market before he made his billions 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Cam's New Arm said:

Screenshot_20200110-182627_Chrome.jpg

There’s a lottttttt of Gamecoks fans/graduates not only in SC but living in Charlotte. To this day, every Bama fan I know calls Cam, $cam N3wton (had to write it like this cuz apparently that name is banned here and gets automatically changed to something else)...so they might not be huge fans of him.

I also know a lot of Clemson fans who are already Panthers fans if they watch NFL. Most all pull for Texans on the side as well just cuz of Watson and Hopkins. So I guess I have a 2 part question:

Who are the “new fans”? If they already watch NFL, they are most likely Panthers fans already just for geographical reasons. And if the typical college football only fan didn’t already recently pull for the Texans due to Watson and Hopkins, what makes u think they will start watching NFL just to pull for Lawrence’s team?

Not a dig at u personally for posting this. Just some questions I had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nope Still missing it. Let's try this a different way... You have two quarterbacks from schools that ran the same kind of offense - maybe even two from the same school - on a given team (not necessarily the Panthers). One is designated the starter while the other is named the backup. Why?
    • yeah, pretty sure boss.....when things match and fit in the NFL.....the results then show it.  and when they don't, well, the results show that as well.  Bryce doesn't fit.   *but I get why late season and wants to argue with everyone Mr. Scot has also turned into a please don't talk to me about stats guy as well.  Given, the stats that reflect offensive productivity work against all your present arguments. 
    • Yeeeah...stats and rankings have zero to do with a discussion of scheme and skill set match. Maybe look up definitions of style vs ability and see if that helps. At this point, you've basically had three different people explain to you where you're wrong, but rather than addressing any of those statements, you're just resorting to straight deflection.  You don't get it. Either that or you're acting like you don't get it so that you can avoid the discussion because it's not going well for you. (that wouldn't surprise me either) 😄 Sme result either way, I suppose.
×
×
  • Create New...