Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Looks like Rhule may target Joe Brady for OC


jb2288

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Panfan35 said:

A healthy cam is better than any QB in this draft and if we trade a healthy cam it would be the Bengals giving up a couple of firsts or a first and a couple of 2nds 

This ignores that Cam is 31 and that how long he can stay healthy for is unknowable but questionable. Do not hold your breathe waiting for the Bengals to call with that offer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

This ignores that Cam is 31 and that how long he can stay healthy for is unknowable but questionable. Do not hold your breathe waiting for the Bengals to call with that offer.

Better than any options this draft. Might not be the case the next year. Getting a 1st next year would be ideal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

Better than any options this draft. Might not be the case the next year. Getting a 1st next year would be ideal.

Oh don’t get me wrong. Of all available options my preference would be for Cam to return and show out, however I hold no illusions about the way other teams will assess his value right now. I’d also rather have that 1st next year too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Cary Kollins said:

I've a weird feeling Tepper is either about to build the next great NFL dynasty or it's going to fail spectacularly. Either way I'm all here for it.


fwiw I guarantee financial gurus were saying similar stuff around the time Tepper was going against the grain in the stock market before he made his billions 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Cam's New Arm said:

Screenshot_20200110-182627_Chrome.jpg

There’s a lottttttt of Gamecoks fans/graduates not only in SC but living in Charlotte. To this day, every Bama fan I know calls Cam, $cam N3wton (had to write it like this cuz apparently that name is banned here and gets automatically changed to something else)...so they might not be huge fans of him.

I also know a lot of Clemson fans who are already Panthers fans if they watch NFL. Most all pull for Texans on the side as well just cuz of Watson and Hopkins. So I guess I have a 2 part question:

Who are the “new fans”? If they already watch NFL, they are most likely Panthers fans already just for geographical reasons. And if the typical college football only fan didn’t already recently pull for the Texans due to Watson and Hopkins, what makes u think they will start watching NFL just to pull for Lawrence’s team?

Not a dig at u personally for posting this. Just some questions I had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...