Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Potentially a bizarre scandal brewing in New Orleans


ellis

Recommended Posts

Unpopular opinion: anything the league does against them shouldn’t affect football. No suspensions or loss of draft pics. This is a non football scandal carried out by team executives. Any punishment should be reflective of that. If it turns out current ownership was involved and the league wants to force a sale of the team I’m fine with that, but players and coaches do not appear to have done anything wrong here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

I’m not sure if it’s a “cover up” per se. it sounds like they advised the church on HOW to release the names from a PR perspective. It’s still really gross to even be associated with monsters but I’m not sure if they actually did anything illegal unless I misread something.

The Saints are not being accused of doing anything illegal, but maybe unethical and immoral with advising the church.  The final decision to cover up belongs solely to the Catholic dioceses of NO. The Saints are not a part of the lawsuit against the archdioceses except that their emails are part of the evidence that the church worked to covered up the sexual abuse. It will be up to the judge whether or not the emails are released to the public and if there are any redactions to protect innocent 3rd parties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Unpopular opinion: anything the league does against them shouldn’t affect football. No suspensions or loss of draft pics. This is a non football scandal carried out by team executives. Any punishment should be reflective of that. If it turns out current ownership was involved and the league wants to force a sale of the team I’m fine with that, but players and coaches do not appear to have done anything wrong here.

What do you mean?  They should be required to sell the team.  The team should then be relocated someplace at least 1500 miles away so the fans suffer.  Oakland is now available.  St. Louis is, but fails the 1500 mile test.  Then the ownership, executives, management, administrative staff, trainers, and star players should be hung publicly, the bodies then burned at the stake, and the ashes collected, given to NASA or SpaceX and blasted into space.  That ought to about do it.

Seriously, though, I agree.  Whoever is involved should bear the brunt.  Those not involved should be not involved.

I'm not sure it is not illegal.  While their direct acts were not illegal, they did know those acts were to help cover up the crime.  That could be seen as furtherance of the criminal conspiracy.  That is for the authorities to decide.

I said this on another thread, but the corruption in that region is perhaps worse than anywhere outside of Chicago.  The difference is Chicago is open about it.  Old-guard institutions and names are simply above the law or any responsibility.  It is like quid pro quo without any regard or judgment of the actions being buried, ignored, or justified.  There is some of that everywhere, but down in that region, it is rampant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Unpopular opinion: anything the league does against them shouldn’t affect football. No suspensions or loss of draft pics. This is a non football scandal carried out by team executives. Any punishment should be reflective of that. If it turns out current ownership was involved and the league wants to force a sale of the team I’m fine with that, but players and coaches do not appear to have done anything wrong here.

To be fair, Jerry Richardson didn't necessarily do anything that affected football either.

An owner selling the team isn't necessarily punitive to the coaches and players (sure as heck wasn't with us).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While there is current litigation relative to the New Orleans Archdiocese and clergy sex abuse, our comments are limited only to the scope of our involvement. The New Orleans Saints organization has always had a very strong relationship with the Archdiocese. The Archdiocese reached out to a number of community and civic minded leaders seeking counsel on handling the pending media attention that would come with the release of the clergy names in November of 2018. Greg Bensel, Senior Vice President of Communications for the New Orleans Saints, was contacted and offered input on how to work with the media. The advice was simple and never wavering. Be direct, open and fully transparent, while making sure that all law enforcement agencies were alerted. The New Orleans Saints, Greg Bensel and Mrs. Gayle Benson were and remain offended, disappointed and repulsed by the actions of certain past clergy. We remain steadfast in support of the victims who have suffered and pray for their continued healing. "Further, the Saints have no interest in concealing information from the press or public. At the current discovery stage in the case of Doe v. Archdiocese, the Saints, through their counsel, have merely requested the court to apply the normal rules of civil discovery to the documents that the Saints produced and delivered to Mr. Doe's counsel. Until the documents are admitted into evidence at a public trial or hearing in the context of relevant testimony by persons having knowledge of the documents and the events to which they pertain, the use of the documents should be limited to the parties to the case and their attorneys. If admitted into evidence of the case, the documents and the testimony pertaining to them will become part of the public record of the trial of the case."

 

https://www.nola.com/news/article_b2a7db30-3ed3-11ea-a5bc-b3d258823285.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...