Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jerricho Cotchery interviewing with Steelers

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

GRWatcher Mentor

GRWatcher

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Also, he caught it.

There are certain phrases that no one but a fan would know what it means. And they should be passed from older fans to the younger ones like an oral tribal history. Look up "It was not a goal" for the Buffalo Sabres. Every Sabres fan, young and old, knows exactly what that refers to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted

Imagine how much differently that game turns out if that is correctly ruled a catch instead... The strip sack TD was like 2 plays after that, that would not have happened if that was a catch. Football is a game of momentum, and that changed the whole game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Or if Talib had been ejected for that facemask on Philly Brown. That play was totally meant to hurt him. 

He admitted it after the game. Said it was the SB and well worth the penalty to save the TD and take our most productive receiver out of the game (Brown had nearly 100 yards in the first half I recall and then left after that play). Absolute bullsh*t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Huddler Grand Master

The Huddler

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, t96 said:

Imagine how much differently that game turns out if that is correctly ruled a catch instead... The strip sack TD was like 2 plays after that, that would not have happened if that was a catch. Football is a game of momentum, and that changed the whole game.

in an alternate reality we won no worries. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
(ATL'ien)CamNewton Newbie

(ATL'ien)CamNewton

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, t96 said:

Imagine how much differently that game turns out if that is correctly ruled a catch instead... The strip sack TD was like 2 plays after that, that would not have happened if that was a catch. Football is a game of momentum, and that changed the whole game.

It wasn't "..like two plays after that.."

The Cotchery non-catch call made it third down - the strip sack TD happened immediately after they called non-catch.

That play, missed call, was the entire game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Soul Rebel
      Cam Jackson

      By Soul Rebel · Posted

      I hope he finds his lane in year 2.  Now that we signed Walker, I'm really intrigued how Dan feels about the DL. Is there a piece there in R1 that presents value/BPA and fills a void for one of the spots w/ DB and Wharton.  I'll give Wharton another year to show us why he was signed here. With A'Shawn gone, I don't think BBIII is it.  Our edges are set and our LBs are balanced. Horn/Mike Jack and Moehrig will hold the secondary together. DB is, well...DB.  However, I think this is an area that is the biggest question mark right now. I see 1 of 3 spots that are locked and loaded for us. If we move to a 4 down front, I assume Phillips would slide down to be the additional linemen, but we still have questions about the other two spots in either scheme.  I'd feel better with a tradeback, but I do wonder how McDonald would do here. Maybe Woods....but McDonald really does peek my interest.  Or, can Jackson take that next step. The coaching staff speaks highly of him for what little he played. Here's hoping he stays healthy and comes into TC with something to prove. There's a spot to be taken, here's hoping he takes it.
    • MHS831
      Cam Jackson

      By MHS831 · Posted

      Not many people talking about DT, but we have a need.  (DE)  Now this guy is a NT like Brown III
    • SmokinwithWilly
      At this point its Sadiq or bust... A

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      But is it about letting Bryce develop or about winning games? Bryce has not been good enough to be an uncontested starter. He just hasn't. How many times has last drive Bryce shown up for 4 entire quarters? Once in 3 seasons? You aren't going to win 9 or 10 one score games every season year in and year out. You may want Bryce in the last 2 minutes. I want that Bryce the full 60.  No one is saying you have to give up on him, but bringing in another QB that can do anything is not hindering Bryce. It helps the team and that's where the focus needs to be. If drafting Sadiq to plague the middle of the field would help out offense, but Bryce struggles to get pass into the middle of the field, is Sadiq a bad pick? Or could he be a good pick with a better option at QB? We can't be afraid to improve. QB, TE, OL, LB, DL, CB, S. It doesn't matter. The goal is SBs, not 5 to 8 years seeing waiting to see if Bryce can develop while the rest of the league keeps passing us by.  Sadiq is a nice option, but I think we have to address tackle if one we like is there because we are painfully thin after this year, a LB to general the field, and a true ball hawking safety that can set the tone in the secondary. Those 3 positions are bigger game changers than a TE that will likely struggle to make a round 1 impact in this offense. 
×
×
  • Create New...