Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A Lot of Talk About LT ... Are You All Just Dismissing Greg Little?


SetfreexX

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

On what basis would we deem him "dependable"?

Draft position doesn't mean jack sh-t if a guy isn't good, at least not to a smart team.

On what basis was Jonah Williams deemed dependable...he was an early draft selection on a bad OL and was out LONGER than Little, so I suppose CIN should take a LT #1...

This is the line of logic you presented here. It's the NFL, you take the BPA, none of the OL have higher grades than Brown, Simmons, and Kinalw potentially in a trade back. We allocated resources in the draft towards the T position (Little, and Daley as a 6th who for a while was the highest rated rookie LT). 

Smart money is on taking care of the defense up front, and adding IOL depth that is available day 2, then bringing in a veteran tackle presence, not a top dollar guy, but someone that can play if the player the team invested multiple picks in turns out to be an injury liability. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SetfreexX said:

On what basis was Jonah Williams deemed dependable...he was an early draft selection on a bad OL and was out LONGER than Little, so I suppose CIN should take a LT #1...

This is the line of logic you presented here. It's the NFL, you take the BPA, none of the OL have higher grades than Brown, Simmons, and Kinalw potentially in a trade back. We allocated resources in the draft towards the T position (Little, and Daley as a 6th who for a while was the highest rated rookie LT). 

Smart money is on taking care of the defense up front, and adding IOL depth that is available day 2, then bringing in a veteran tackle presence, not a top dollar guy, but someone that can play if the player the team invested multiple picks in turns out to be an injury liability. 

I'm fine with using the #7 pick on the best available player.

I'm not fine with going into next season depending on Greg Little to do something he has yet to show he can do.

Even when he was healthy, he wasn't exactly anything special. And the longer the season went, the worse he got when he did play.

Whether it's by draft, free agency or just moving Taylor Moton (which might actually happen now that Ron Rivera isn't here anymore) we need another option at left tackle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dismissing?  No.

Worried about NFL players coming off of injuries?  Yes.

If your team is counting on multiple starters, especially big men, coming off injuries to be above average starters...well, you are probably in for a rude awakening.

I have doubts about Poe, Newton, Paradis, Little, Trai, KK, etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, thefuzz said:

If your team is counting on multiple starters, especially big men, coming off injuries to be above average starters...well, you are probably in for a rude awakening.

You mean like they did last season?

I'd like to think they're not dumb enough to do the same thing again, but then I remember who's in charge. And I remember saying "We're not dumb enough to go into another season without a proven backup quarterback, are we?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Little played well early before getting 18485893475754 concussions.  But you do realize with all the numbers you are putting up about pressure rate that in 1 game last year ( Atlanta I think) Little gave up 14 pressures and 2 sacks.  That's not for the season mind you that is for 1 game.  So anytime people say Little is the answer I pump the brakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

You mean like they did last season?

I'd like to think they're not dumb enough to do the same thing again, but then I remember who's in charge. And I remember saying "We're not dumb enough to go into another season without a proven backup quarterback, are we?"

Cam is coming off injury, and we are having a farewell season to Peppers, TD, Kalil, possibly Olsen....do we need a backup QB?

Marty:  Nah.

Cam is coming off injury, and we just stacked up the defense with run blockers and pass rusher free agents, Olsen came back, but it's probably his last year here, and we have the best RB in the NFL.....do we need a backup QB.

Marty:  Hell's yes we do....check out this rook from QB U.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bababoey said:

Little played well early before getting 18485893475754 concussions.  But you do realize with all the numbers you are putting up about pressure rate that in 1 game last year ( Atlanta I think) Little gave up 14 pressures and 2 sacks.  That's not for the season mind you that is for 1 game.  So anytime people say Little is the answer I pump the brakes.

Greg Little had 224 snaps, and allowed 3 sacks, that is a 1.339% sacks allowed percentage. (Also 3 penalties in that same span)

https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/greg-little/46254

I'm not saying he's elite, but he was a pretty good prospect coming in and with experience should continue to improve. I'm holding off a lot of the OL judgement with guys like Allen / Grier under center, missing open reads. 

I'm not saying ''not to invest in the OL'' I just don't think #7 overall is the place, I think we're better served adding some veteran depth vs having a rookie, and two 2nd year guys as the primary options on the perimeter, I'd prefer a mid tier veteran as the 2nd LT. 

Health is always a concern, but no reports are alerting any health concerns.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SetfreexX said:

Greg Little had 224 snaps, and allowed 3 sacks, that is a 1.339% sacks allowed percentage. (Also 3 penalties in that same span)

https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/greg-little/46254

I'm not saying he's elite, but he was a pretty good prospect coming in and with experience should continue to improve. I'm holding off a lot of the OL judgement with guys like Allen / Grier under center, missing open reads. 

I'm not saying ''not to invest in the OL'' I just don't think #7 overall is the place, I think we're better served adding some veteran depth vs having a rookie, and two 2nd year guys as the primary options on the perimeter, I'd prefer a mid tier veteran as the 2nd LT. 

Health is always a concern, but no reports are alerting any health concerns.  

You amusingly left out the part where he graded out as a 52.7 out of 100 on their ratings scale, which is largely due to how many pressures and hits he gave up

To put this in perspective, Paradis was a 67 out of 100, despite how terrible he was.

So by your own metrics, Little was just short of a dumpster fire last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Can you give him the opportunity to find out? 

He will get every single opportunity to prove that he is a top flight offensive tackle, he doesn't need us to let him do that, the coaches will make sure of it.

However, it doesn't mean that we should just blindly put faith in him being up to the task, nor should be ignore the offensive tackle position in this draft because he "had bad injury luck" as a rookie.

I'm scared that Hurney thinks enough of Little that he just needs to get healthy and he will be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am trying to remember when I EVER said reach for need. My thing if someone falls you jump, if you can trade back a few slots and get help at the right value and pick up some ammo to move up from 51 which I think is outside the money zone, then you do that.   Take a WR later. Plenty of capable WRs have come from the 3rd round. Though this year I would go for C there if there was a reasonable choice. Take a TE if you must. I see more reason to take WR than TE. I think you give guys drafted two years ago and last year a chance to develop before cancelling them.    I think it is kind of unrealistic to throw everything all in on offense in hopes of going deep in the playoffs after an 8-10 year, even if it did have some nice bright spots in it.    And outside of this argument but relevant to it, I am bothered by Canales and Morgan and their apparent posture that we have arrived and are now in the big boy club. I don’t know where that comes from. They are out there talking like they are winners at 8-10. Backing into the playoffs in a real convoluted tie breaker scenario. They had some good games, yes. But the big feather n the cap, the LA Rams matchups, did you see what the Rams did? They didn’t fire the coaches but they fired their defensive backs. Bryce beat them yes, and it was pretty, but it was kind of like the Bucs and Mike Evans picking on our decimated secondary in 2022. Someone (Wilks) went down for allowing that to happen and they went down in LA too.  Wr aren’t as good as a whole lot of homers think we are. Shore up the trenches.    I think too many fans buy into it because they are so starved for anything that looks like a winner. 
    • How exactly does one win OROY "by default"? Wouldn't winning the award mean that of the two, McMillon stayed strong the entire year while the other guy didn't and fizzled out? That's like saying Secretariat only won by default because the other horse stopped moving midway through the race. Absolutely zero logic in that statement, which makes me very glad that I've never really paid much attention to Walterfoozball.
    • I agree, teams in the past have fired the HC in order to retain a coach on staff...hell it happened to Mcderp this year, rams in the past and Im missing another.  The fall off for the Panthers team defense was huge once Mcderp leftd and Ron could not fix it even when he named himself DC. 
×
×
  • Create New...