Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Are Trading OL Trai Turner To LAC For LT Russell Okung


bobsfoodbasics

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, pantherj said:

Hopefully Okung's pulmonary embolism and half dozen lower body injuries don't start acting up lol.

Yeah, he had one injury after another last year. Missed half of the season and only had one game where he played 100% of snaps. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you didn't realize this.. But other were telling you they aren't giving up on Little Moton or Daley and probably bring in a vet option for stop gap and give them time to develop.. Plus it clears Turner money... Now your clearing a big contract and get a vet teacher for our young LT ALREADY ON THE ROSTER!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Trai but he seemed to do nothing on the line for a few years now despite being the guy we paid franchise money to. He was consistently present but that’s about all. He can be replaced with someone with something to prove. 
 

At least with Okung we’ve got someone who can compete at one of our toughest positions and either hold it down or be the vet for the youth. He’s gone after a year if we want. Low risk trade here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 isn’t THAT old for a LT. And swapping him for Turner doesn’t seem like in our favor but at least we didn’t give up picks for him and we didn’t accept some low pick for Turner. Win win at this point, imo. Assuming Turner just wasn’t a guy they wanted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Real1zOnly said:

Turner was arguably our best lineman down year or not. He was the only lineman who played nasty. I feel sorry for Cam. Another busted aging LT to protect his blindside.smh

Don't understand the outrage. Turner was terrible and constantly getting bulldozed. We could put a traffic cone there and get the same results. He was no where near our best lineman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...