Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Russell Okung - Leads The Way (Worth a Watch)


SetfreexX

Recommended Posts

Russell comes across as very sharp and intelligent. When those type guys have the physical skills, they are usually one of your best options. Excited about having this guy on the roster this year. Not a Hurney fan by any means but so far liking this move. Takes a lot of pressure off draft wise and opens up options. Okung probably a better option than any rookie tackle we could have drafted so in a critical year for Cam, this is huge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love that Carolina picked this guy up and hes a Servant first" thank you Lord Jesus Christ" He was used to Glory God and leave his mark in LA now he will leave his mark in Carolina.. We all have a purpose if its for good or bad our choice" Every Word that exits our mouth gives life or death to all that hears it.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People do forget this guy has some rings and protected Wilson when that line was worth a poo. However, much like everything on this team currently, his play and this move is just up in the air. My question is where the fug was this last year instead of reaching on two fuging tackles in the draft hurney? Or any other year where we clearly needed a left tackle and drafting someone not in the top ten and calling them a started was clearly the answer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RumHam said:

People do forget this guy has some rings and protected Wilson when that line was worth a poo. However, much like everything on this team currently, his play and this move is just up in the air. My question is where the fug was this last year instead of reaching on two fuging tackles in the draft hurney? Or any other year where we clearly needed a left tackle and drafting someone not in the top ten and calling them a started was clearly the answer?

The option has to be available w/o breaking the resource cabinet too, a T at the top of the 2nd is not a reach, and neither was Daley in the 6th. The 3 corner DG draft was reaches on Worley, and Sanchez. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, SetfreexX said:

The option has to be available w/o breaking the resource cabinet too, a T at the top of the 2nd is not a reach, and neither was Daley in the 6th. The 3 corner DG draft was reaches on Worley, and Sanchez. 

here we go, hurnder apologists. Pretty sure those two weren't drafted near as high. Try again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okung seems like an intelligent man that has his priorities straight in life.  I hope he can stay healthy and help us this year.  It will be a solid pick up if so.  No offense to Trai Turner, but a solid LT is 10x more important than a solid RG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, RumHam said:

People do forget this guy has some rings and protected Wilson when that line was worth a poo. However, much like everything on this team currently, his play and this move is just up in the air. My question is where the fug was this last year instead of reaching on two fuging tackles in the draft hurney? Or any other year where we clearly needed a left tackle and drafting someone not in the top ten and calling them a started was clearly the answer?

You may be confusing the term reach for steal as it pertains to Daley. Daley graded out similarly to Dillard who was the first tackle drafted. Getting anything out of a 6th round pick is gravy. Getting one who is at worst solid depth at both guard and tackle, and potentially a serviceable starter, is a huge bonus. 

Of course I'm sure your angst is primarily towards Little (although I'd say the jury is still out on him). But when you exaggerate your points to give them more weight, you just end up cheapening your argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Peon Awesome said:

You may be confusing the term reach for steal as it pertains to Daley. Daley graded out similarly to Dillard who was the first tackle drafted. Getting anything out of a 6th round pick is gravy. Getting one who is at worst solid depth at both guard and tackle, and potentially a serviceable starter, is a huge bonus. 

Of course I'm sure your angst is primarily towards Little (although I'd say the jury is still out on him). But when you exaggerate your points to give them more weight, you just end up cheapening your argument.

say what?  Dillard was always projected in the first and daley I believe was 5th round at best

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, SetfreexX said:

 

 

He certainly comes across as thoughtful and intelligent, but let's keep in mind that this video was produced by the 700 Club, of the Christian Broadcasting Network, so it understandably stresses his spiritual side, not his violent side.

What seems to me more important about this trade is the value he adds to our OL, and the signal it sends that a rebuild is not a tank.  Turner was going anyway, and we got good value with this replacement, while at the same time, putting proven strength at a more vital position.  Protecting Cam from the LT spot is vital to success, and to me, this is another sign that Rhule wants Cam at QB, and he wants him to be protected.

An ancillary benefit is that Van Roten won"t have to babysit a series of LTs who relied on him to reposition them.  GVR has gotten a lot of bad reviews in the Huddle, and IMO, undeservedly so.  He's an effective zone blocker, always a big factor in every big run that CMC broke last year, and he's probably going to be a better pass blocker, now that Okung's here, and he's freed up to do his job, without added responsibilities of having to help out novice LTs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not in same league. Caldwell just hit a 10.00 on the RAS. 2nd out of 3830 from 1987 onward.  https://x.com/MathBomb/status/2027885023387349047 Yeah I mean Louis had a sub 9.00 RAS. Still very very good, no doubt. Louis is small, no 2 ways about it. He is likely a sub package lb in nickel packages or specialized WLB. Be fine ST gunner to start for sure. 6 foot flat and 220lb is pushing it for a starting LB. At 10 to 20lbs less than the other LBs he'd better be closer to the top in most timed drills. He's gonna be challenged when some of the wrs in the class can matchup bigger stronger faster, much less TE in the run game.  Yeah instinct matter and he has them, but that size is a massive red flag compared to many of the other LBS in this class.    Rodriguez is the LB that really climbed this week from a pure grit guy to great flash with athleticism people wrote off cause he was a QB at first at UVA. 18.4mph in the backpedal. Production the last 2 years were great. I'd be thrilled with him as the future mike.   Hill likely moved out of 51 and into the top 45 picks ( Ravens at 45 I can't imagine don't bite if he makes it there). Honestly Hill imo is a 1st rounder and I'd be ok with him as he fits the MLB we have missed the last few years. People would crow it's a reach but he's top 30 all-time I'm RAS for a LB at 9.9+ . Plus he was big time in big games when he was healthy. And that br a big check: meds. 
    • Miller, Melo, Coby, Moose, and Bridges all on the floor at the same time must be a nightmare for defenses lol. Switch one out for Kon and still a nightmare. Coby really does bring a true 6th man value and looks like he could start if Melo was out after only a few games of getting his feet wet. 
×
×
  • Create New...