Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Compensatory picks are out


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, panther4life said:

The picks can be traded as well.  They are valuable capital.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, panfanman said:

So Luke's value will not kick in until next year?

Luke will not count.  He retired.  It's treated as though we cut him.  The player has to be signed by another team for him to count in the compensatory pick formula.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ricky Spanish said:

If you aren't getting any, you aren't doing your job right as a GM. 

Completely disagree.  The two have zero correlation.

Assume you draft really well - good players, players like your organization and want to stay.  Take team friendly deals to do so.  You get zero comps . . . and that's not doing your job?

Assume you draft really poorly - players you want gone.  You're forced to sign FA's off the market to cover for it.  You get zero comps.

Comp picks have zero correlation to doing your job or not doing your job as a GM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Completely disagree.  The two have zero correlation.

Assume you draft really well - good players, players like your organization and want to stay.  Take team friendly deals to do so.  You get zero comps . . . and that's not doing your job?

Assume you draft really poorly - players you want gone.  You're forced to sign FA's off the market to cover for it.  You get zero comps.

Comp picks have zero correlation to doing your job or not doing your job as a GM.

If you have a lot of other teams valuing your outgoing players that come available, it absolutely means that your team both drafted well, and coached them up....while continuing to draft well and replace those outgoing (overpriced) free agents.

The top 4 since the 1994 season when the comp picks were started are the Ravens, Cowboys, Packers, and Pats.

3 of the 4 are consistent winners in the NFL, the other was at one point, but has come back to Earth in the last 10 years...and before we start laughing at the Boys being there....they have been to the playoffs exactly 1 less time than us in the last decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, catnip said:

Nothing for Olsen ?

We won't get much.

The biggest portion of deciding what comp pick you get is the size of the contract signed by the player after leaving your team, and your choosing to not bring in any additional free agents.

Think Peppers leaving for Chicago, or Norman leaving for WAS., those give you good comp picks, not the lower cost guys that leave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, thefuzz said:

We won't get much.

The biggest portion of deciding what comp pick you get is the size of the contract signed by the player after leaving your team, and your choosing to not bring in any additional free agents.

Think Peppers leaving for Chicago, or Norman leaving for WAS., those give you good comp picks, not the lower cost guys that leave.

I think it would figure into next years comp anyway.  With him being cut, im not sure we would get a comp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • a 4th for him is well worth the risk.  It is also a low enough pick that it shouldn't really shake the locker room.  A 4th rounder that will sit this year and maybe take Pickett's spot next year or best case midseason where we can flip Kenny to a QB needy team midseason.  It's also a nice insurance policy for Young.  Especially with him sitting a year and learning the system.  Seems like a low risk move.  You can still draft one next year if needed and let them compete.  
    • He was draft eligible last year and chose to go back to transfer and play another year of college ball despite it being a weak QB draft and next year's considered to likely he far better and now people think teams are going to part with a higher pick than he would've gotten drafted with in April after it's come out that he's basically a degenerate gambling addict? What am I missing here? I'll be surprised if any team offers up more than a 5th and it won't surprise me if no one even offers that.
    • If You’re a team with multiple 1st round picks it would be a decent setup for a gamble - if I understand the rules.  You are bidding 2027 currency and get to use the player in 2026.     You get the season to look at him and if you are unhappy then you still have another 1st round pick for after the season. Two in the case of the Jets.   So if you mess it up there is a fast way to recover from it.  
×
×
  • Create New...