Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hospitalization in SC - 1423 today. Everyday day continues a new high mark in hospitalizations.  Deaths will follow suit (22 today)

1423 is COVID hospitalizations in SC.  

Total beds occupied (for any illness) in SC is still hovering at 75%

*NC follows setting another hospitalization  record  at 1034. 

Going to be REALLY hard for schools to open back up here as both states continue climbing to their peaks of the pandemic.  School returning  will have its own giant bump it would bring. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

remember the vast majority of the patients diagnosed with covid19 don't get a hospital bed right away

it's taking around 5-7 days for most people that end up needing a bed getting one for covid19. they're getting sent home and being told to hang tough, then......

basically what im saying is SC is turbo fuged

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

remember the vast majority of the patients diagnosed with covid19 don't get a hospital bed right away

it's taking around 5-7 days for most people that end up needing a bed getting one for covid19. they're getting sent home and being told to hang tough, then......

basically what im saying is SC is turbo fuged

Yeah, I don’t really care about newly reported cases.  Lot of that is asymptotic healthy people that are tested because they can or had an exposure, barely sick people, people retesting, etc.  

hospitalizations is the number and it ain’t good. SC is worse than NC but don’t sleep on NC.  They are trending the same. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really confused why all these sites have different numbers. 

https://covid19-projections.com/us-sc lists 884 deaths.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/south-carolina/ lists 905

Should at least something as straightforward as deaths be the same? 

https://covid19-projections.com/us-sc says over 9k newly infected 

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/south-carolina/ shows only 1500 new cases.

I'm very confused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, trueblade said:

I'm really confused why all these sites have different numbers. 

https://covid19-projections.com/us-sc lists 884 deaths.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/south-carolina/ lists 905

Should at least something as straightforward as deaths be the same? 

https://covid19-projections.com/us-sc says over 9k newly infected 

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/south-carolina/ shows only 1500 new cases.

I'm very confused.

Easy question.  

These are not official sites. They gather statistic from offical sources, collected by code or people manually adding it.

 

If you want accurate numbers always go to the offical sites. 

These sites should only be used to get a overview, a general picture of the situation in countries and states.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CRA said:

Yeah, I don’t really care about newly reported cases.  Lot of that is asymptotic healthy people that are tested because they can or had an exposure, barely sick people, people retesting, etc.  

hospitalizations is the number and it ain’t good. SC is worse than NC but don’t sleep on NC.  They are trending the same. 

 

A little over 1000 hospitalizations in a population of 10.5 million when this thing has been here since March does not say "hotspot" to me. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Wolfcop said:

A little over 1000 hospitalizations in a population of 10.5 million when this thing has been here since March does not say "hotspot" to me. 

1. a vast minority of patients with covid require hospitalization. far more will, in the coming days, but for now we're still actually in the early days of this spike

2. doctors are encouraging patients NOT to be admitted, knowing they need the ICU space. South Carolina right now is at about 76% occupancy, and that is about to spike. 

3. Infections race ahead of positive cases race ahead of hospitalizations. The data coming out of south carolina right now is....horrific. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

2. doctors are encouraging patients NOT to be admitted, knowing they need the ICU space. South Carolina right now is at about 76% occupancy, and that is about to spike.

Have there been an increase in ICU units? Can they increase it?

In Sweden we had about 526 ICU before the pandemic. During the pandemic it was increased to 1000-1100. Lowest number of free capacity was around 18% (from my memory). ICU in Sweden = always ventilators + personnel to man the unit. Otherwise the patient falls under "hospitalization".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wolfcop said:

A little over 1000 hospitalizations in a population of 10.5 million when this thing has been here since March does not say "hotspot" to me. 

You're right. NC isn't a hotspot right now. And our goal is not to become one. The cases steadily rising though requires us to keep our guard up. Don't forget that we've only been in phase 2 for a month and a half and it can take a couple weeks from exposure to hospitalization. We certainly could be worse, but we also shouldn't be high fiving and patting ourselves on the back for setting records for number of hospitalizations without a clear end in sight.

Recently saw a video of Ron de Santis from a few weeks ago boasting defiantly how Florida had been open for weeks and were not seeing many cases. How everyone said their hospitals would get overwhelmed but they were wrong. Looks incredibly foolish now. The problem is if we ignore the trends and loosen all restrictions, the virus can and likely will spread exponentially and we'll join the ranks of Florida, Texas, and Arizona. I don't think we will because to this point, Roy Cooper has been following medical advice and holding off on opening the major niduses for spread like bars. But he's getting heavily opposed from the NC legislature and at some point the pressure may become too much. Guess we'll see. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Peon Awesome said:

You're right. NC isn't a hotspot right now. And our goal is not to become one. The cases steadily rising though requires us to keep our guard up. Don't forget that we've only been in phase 2 for a month and a half and it can take a couple weeks from exposure to hospitalization. We certainly could be worse, but we also shouldn't be high fiving and patting ourselves on the back for setting records for number of hospitalizations without a clear end in sight.

Recently saw a video of Ron de Santis from a few weeks ago boasting defiantly how Florida had been open for weeks and were not seeing many cases. How everyone said their hospitals would get overwhelmed but they were wrong. Looks incredibly foolish now. The problem is if we ignore the trends and loosen all restrictions, the virus can and likely will spread exponentially and we'll join the ranks of Florida, Texas, and Arizona. I don't think we will because to this point, Roy Cooper has been following medical advice and holding off on opening the major niduses for spread like bars. But he's getting heavily opposed from the NC legislature and at some point the pressure may become too much. Guess we'll see. 

DeSantis was being attacked saying his state was going to be New York.  It's not New York, and they have a long ways to go to get there.  If Florida becomes New York, he was wrong.  If it doesn't, while we have our opinions, he was not really wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't need that many words to say Bryce Young has not yet surpassed the caliber of QB play that current Joe Flacco represents.   I have watched every game Bryce has played.  He doesn't give you average QB play.   He can't make a ton of throws.  Bryce is consistent overall in what he is.  You can take outlier games on both ends of the spectrum out of play and judge him or any QB.....for Bryce it is unquestioned bottom of the league play.  All you have to do is watch the two play.  Flacco is good enough that if you can keep up right and give him time.....he presents a level of play Bryce can't do as a passer  
    • Not sure.  Which ones have more GWDs in the same time frame?
    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
×
×
  • Create New...