Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kuechly's Retirement Money & It's Dead Cap Hit


SetfreexX

Recommended Posts

As you know, we are eating 11M in dead cap due to Luke's retirement. I haven't seen any reports about the team seeking that money out, does anyone know if there is a deadline on that? Is the front office looking to be classy by letting him keep all of it with plans to eat the loss since this was health related. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, going after money from a great player hanging up the cleats in his prime due to health concerns in a presser while fighting back tears is going to sell very well to recruiting free agents and trying to re-sign our own guys. The Colts didn't go after Luck's money and we aren't going after Luke's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

I don’t know why contracts can’t be written, or should have been written, to translate this type of thing to a cash payment and not punish teams for these sudden retirements. By doing that, the players get their  money, and teams are not punished.  Win Win

Probably if it doesnt count against the cap, then the player would be off the hook so to speak.  If they decide to unretire, we still own their contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

I don’t know why contracts can’t be written, or should have been written, to translate this type of thing to a cash payment and not punish teams for these sudden retirements. By doing that, the players get their  money, and teams are not punished.  Win Win

It's because team's still want the rights to that player. Not all retirements are permanent. Retirement is written the same as injury. NFLPA wanted to make sure the players get paid whether they retire or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

I don’t know why contracts can’t be written, or should have been written, to translate this type of thing to a cash payment and not punish teams for these sudden retirements. By doing that, the players get their  money, and teams are not punished.  Win Win

They are written that way.  Our dead cap hit for Luke is his signing bonus, which we paid Luke on the day he signed the contract.  He has the money, it was a cash payment.

The reason we still SEE that money is because of the way the NFL allows teams to spread out the CAP hit from a signing bonus over the entire length of the contract.  Instead of having to take Luke's entire salary and signing bonus against our cap the first year he signed it, we spread the signing bonus out over the whole contract.

Because he retired, we now have to account for his entire remaining portion of his signing bonus.  We paid him the money, so we have to account for it.

You also can't write contract rule exceptions that allow teams to simply dump signing bonus for players who retire.  It would be entirely to easy to take advantage of or manipulate.  Would be a mess.

What "needs" to happen is more money needs to move from signing bonuses to performance bonuses or guaranteed salary.  Good luck selling players on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, going after money from a great player hanging up the cleats in his prime due to health concerns in a presser while fighting back tears is going to sell very well to recruiting free agents and trying to re-sign our own guys. The Colts didn't go after Luck's money and we aren't going after Luke's.

Yeah, I'm not knocking the PR nightmare, or ramifications, was just curious we hadn't heard either way, I think we all just moved along with the assumption, I think a guy made a good point, on the off chance he returns we have his contact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, going after money from a great player hanging up the cleats in his prime due to health concerns in a presser while fighting back tears is going to sell very well to recruiting free agents and trying to re-sign our own guys. The Colts didn't go after Luck's money and we aren't going after Luke's.

Lions did it to Megatron

He wants nothing to do with the organization any longer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder is there a list of players that teams have gone after for a return of the money, and a list of players that have been allowed to keep theirs.

Lions went after Calvin Johnson’s, while the Colts and Panthers (assuming) allowed Luck and Luke to keep theirs. Would be interesting to see, and to see if organizations have been inconsistent in their giving and taking away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's an interesting conversation, because there are posters here who stay in the pockets of certain Panthers players while overlooking others.

Personally I think it's fuged up to try to go after that money no matter who the player is. If they were the ones out there risking themselves they keep it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sasquatch said:

They started the "get signing bonus money back" with Barry Sanders.

I think those were also a bit different situations. Luke was an all-time great player who retired in his prime due to health concerns. Barry and Megatron were all-time great players who retired in their primes in large part because they didn't want to play for the fuging Detroit Lions anymore. LOL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • For starters, and again I am not sure what his capacity is in the media or how connected he is to the team, but I posted above Al Wallace says he is "absolutely" getting 50+ a year and he deserves it.  I obviously strongly disagree with it but it feels like like season when the team is slow leaking info to gauge the temp.   Secondly nobody on Gods green earth is going to sign an extension making less than he is making now.  Thats just crazy talk.  
    • No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
×
×
  • Create New...