Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Verge's Mock Draft and Insight thread 2020


Verge

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Madwolf said:

The Dolphins don't have anyone to speak of at QB, and neither do the Chargers. If they weren't taking a QB the probably would have both signed someone.

The Dolphins are basically in love with Tua and Herbert.

IDK all the recent reports are saying both, but mainly the Chargers may not take one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Madwolf said:

The Dolphins don't have anyone to speak of at QB, and neither do the Chargers. If they weren't taking a QB the probably would have both signed someone.

The Dolphins are basically in love with Tua and Herbert.

cam newton football GIF by Nickelodeon
if they go another route they have plenty of options available at QB in the FA market 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Madwolf said:

The Dolphins don't have anyone to speak of at QB, and neither do the Chargers. If they weren't taking a QB the probably would have both signed someone.

The Dolphins are basically in love with Tua and Herbert.

There's a FA QB sitting out there that might be giving either or both of these front offices some mental flexibility on who and how they will draft.

:thinking:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Jared Patterson said:

Verge, 

Are we sure the Dolphins and Chargers are going to take a QB?

Anything could happen, but I feel pretty good about both of them. Everything coming out now is some desperate smoke attempt. I don't believe the Dolphins would trade up for a tackle, that makes zero sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Making sense of the noise about Giants and Hebert. 

He believes that Miami is throwing smoke that they will trade up for the tackle that New York wants (Wirfs/Thomas/Wills) so New York is throwing smoke that they like Hebert (Lol) to bait a team to trade to three so that their tackles stays and they can get him at four. 

Who knows I guess. Andrew Thomas getting legitimate top 10 buzz though. Miami might have liked Tua this whole time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here's the primary reason i disagree with the argument of simmons not getting to do what he does best if we pick him, because he'll be dealing with a LB at the second level:

while that is true, you have to consider that this team is poo. we are not going to be good for a while. when you are rebuilding, you build for the future, not for next season. we can take a defensive tackle this year in the 2nd or 3rd, and another one next year if we need to. we still have an atleast solid DT (who has been a probowler in the past) at that spot for now. i can also promise you that next year, there will not be a 6'4, 230 pound linebacker who can play safety and runs a 4.39, and has national title expereince to boot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No you dont.  He had all those records for years before his final season. Whether career or season he had them all years before his final season in which he played 6 games.
    • Williams covered for Moore by saying they were on the wrong page about Moores specific route. Williams could have easily covered for him by saying he messed up. Suggesting only 1 route was ever intended to be a viable target is absurd.
    • I am going to agree with Linville this time--I think we need to get a veteran edge (We have Jones II, Scourton, and Princely--2 developmental guys and a decent veteran).  We don't really think of Jones because he had a hamstring injury weeks 3 and 4 and a back that required surgery Week 6-17.  He still managed 10 pressures, and he will be 28.  Princely Umanmielen only played in approximately 18-20% of the snaps and he struggled at times.  Basically, he was a situational pass rusher.  He got 1.5 sacks and 10 pressures.  He should improve, but for now, he is what he is.  Scourton gives us hope.  For a rookie (and thanks to Jones II's injuries, he was given more PT), he had 8 sacks--and held the edge.  He played at a first-round draft pick level.  He has the potential to become "that guy" in 2026. We lose Wonnum, who played nearly 700 snaps and amassed 3 whole sacks.  For a person raised a Gamecock, I would not be upset if we purged our roster of all South Carolina alumni.   However, I see it this way:  Wonnum was decent holding the edge, something Patrick Jones II and Scourton have demonstrated at a high level.  He is a liability, if you ask me.    Jones had 7 sacks one season in Minnesota and is known for his inside rushing ability--not what you would call a speed rusher.  I think Princely was a bit disappointing, but he was a bit raw.  Out of college, they described him as being a bit predictable.  I see no reason he will not improve in 2026 and become a situational pass rusher.   Basically, with Scourton and Princely expected to continue to develop and Jones II returning from injury, I think we need another veteran (if we can get a good one) to give us balance and depth.  A third developmental player is not ideal.   Draft:  OT, LB, WR, OL depth, S. Free Agency:  Edge, possibly a WR;  re-sign Mays, Cuhran, BC (??), and Nijman.  Let walk:  Wonnum, Scott, Dowdle.  I see about $20m per year after signing the OL depth.  Spend it on a veteran edge.   Players like Reddick (Tampa), Bosa (Buffalo), Khalil Mack (LAC) could be available on a one or two year deal in the $15m range.  We could splurge here, but I think a veteran situational pass rusher (depending on Jones II's back) is all we need while our 2 young guns develop.    
×
×
  • Create New...