Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why Doesn't Kinlaw's Injury History Concern More Panthers Fans


Soul Rebel

Recommended Posts

It seems like Brown was "our guy" since during the college season when he was dominating against SEC teams. He was a disruptive force and a monster inside at stopping the run and in opposing team's backfields. The only negative that seems to have come out was some of his combine drills. His 3-cone is concerning, and he seems like he has some work to do in pass rush and getting after the QB.  Other than that, all he's done is dominate the trenches while at Auburn. 

Now someone like Kinlaw is an athletic specimen and with some amazing numbers. His tape looked very good this past year, but he is also more raw with a ton of upside.

Kinlaw's injury history has barely been brought up and from what I've seen has been cleared. However, he has had hip issues and some knee tendanitis too. Again, he was cleared medically, but there is a history there.

For everyone that is Kinlaw-over-Brown, I'm curious as to why using the #7 pick on Kinlaw is preferred over Brown. It just seems like Kinlaw is getting a pass despite injury concerns and rawness, while Brown is being dinged for a couple of drills at the underwear olympics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His motor is the biggest concern. You can coach up a lot of things but that is one that is not easy or a given. Great upside but raw. The injuries are a little concerning but it's hard to gauge without real information. Could be a blip or a huge deal. That's on the team and all we can do is hope they have good information on that stuff. 

I think he is really just novelty talk when it comes to still holding the 7th pick. Hard to pretend to be serious about the guy because he absolutely should not be the pick unless we trade back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This past week I heard a couple of different veiw points on Kinlaw- teams flagged his combine MRIs and the other was he was red hot. All teams that are looking for a trade up, on focused on him.

I seen this today-

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001110281/article/2020-nfl-draft-will-injury-issues-impact-five-notable-prospects

 

Quote

Javon Kinlaw, DT, South Carolina: Lower-body injuries are always concerning with big men such as Kinlaw (6-foot-5 1/8, 324 pounds), a first-team Associated Press All-American in 2019 who previously had a labrum repaired in one of his hips, as well as a past back injury and two knees that multiple teams have flagged as at risk of arthritis. "Wear and tear" is the term most used following Kinlaw's combine MRIs; no team is known to have failed him on a physical. Several teams -- including a few picking high -- say they have no issue with Kinlaw's medical, making it unlikely a top-20 talent falls out of the first round.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love the kid's story and if we trade back, I'd want him. I remember Jourdan mentioning him and the Panthers fondness for him, and then I feel like for the next week or so seeing a lot of people saying if they had to choose a DT to walk away with in R1, many preferred Kinlaw. 

I guess it's like anything else with the draft...ebbs and flows. Some of it has legs and where there's smoke, there's fire. But also, lots of rumors, garbage takes and people trying to get clicks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...