Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Veterans beware


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, stbugs said:

What purpose? Do you think that somehow he makes us a playoff team? Is he truly worth paying $13M to this year? At the end of the day, he hits our cap for an extra $13M if he’s on the team this year.

His cap hit is just over $19m....the dead cap hit if we cut now him is $17m.  So he costs us an additional $2m to keep him.  Only a complete idiot would cut him now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, panthers55 said:

Short isn't really a good example. If we cut him we incur 17 million in dead cap space which is only 2 million less than keeping him. If you were going to cut him next year will be the best time when we won't have almost 50 million of dead cap space like we do already 

Well, we would save a lot in "real cash" though. I 100% agree that for the purposes of cap space it wouldn't make much sense. It would make a lot of sense for "saving money" though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Well, we would save a lot in "real cash" though. I 100% agree that for the purposes of cap space it wouldn't make much sense. It would make a lot of sense for "saving money" though. 

Tepper is a billionaire. He doesn't need to save money. He does need to fit everything under the salary cap though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/23/2020 at 12:47 AM, pantherclaw said:

We need short.

You guys are hating. 

We do need Short, but it has been years since we've seen KK in a dominant, or even disruptive role on defense. Since the big contract and sending Star into the Great White North, KK has underperformed. Last year was an injury season for him, but do you think he'd have been putting forth much effort in those late season games had he remained healthy.

We do need Short, it's just we haven't gotten what we need from him for the past few years. He'll be playing for his next contract this time around, so maybe the motivation will be there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, MadHatter said:

His cap hit is just over $19m....the dead cap hit if we cut now him is $17m.  So he costs us an additional $2m to keep him.  Only a complete idiot would cut him now.

Lol. Only a complete idiot doesn’t get the salary cap. I can’t believe people continue to post incorrectly.

Short has $17M in dead cap. That’s the only thing you got right. Let me explain that you don’t reduce that at all. Only a complete idiot would think that.

If he plays with us this year, that dead cap is $6M in 2020 and $11M in 2021. If he plays with us this year we also pay $13M in NEW salary. So, to summarize, we lose $30M in cap space this year and next to keep a mediocre DT.

If we cut him now we get hit with the $17M in dead cap this year (not going to do the post June 1st cut as we don’t need that). We only lose $17M in cap space so we save $2M this year and $11M this year.

Only a complete idiot thinks cutting him only saves us $2M. That same idiot would probably be pissed that we had $11M in 2021 dead cap for Short.

I will reiterate this for anyone else that doesn’t get it. Dead cap comes from bonuses already paid that are spread over the life of the contract or years a player plays if released. You CANNOT reduce dead cap by paying the player another year or two of salary. All you are doing is pushing it out. It has to hit at some point and with rollover you absolutely save space to use later. Without rollover this is a different discussion and all that matters is if Tepper wants to write another $13M check to Short. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, panthers55 said:

Tepper is a billionaire. He doesn't need to save money. He does need to fit everything under the salary cap though.

See my post. It’s not just the cash savings. You are ignoring the ability to rollover the $13M you save this year from new salary. Since we are rebuilding, I’d rather have that $13M in 2021 to pay Moton or Moore or save for 2022/2023 when a Matthieu or Clark etc. could help when we are ready to make a run. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, stbugs said:

See my post. It’s not just the cash savings. You are ignoring the ability to rollover the $13M you save this year from new salary. Since we are rebuilding, I’d rather have that $13M in 2021 to pay Moton or Moore or save for 2022/2023 when a Matthieu or Clark etc. could help when we are ready to make a run. 

We don't seem to care much about rolling over cap money for whatever reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Lol. Only a complete idiot doesn’t get the salary cap. I can’t believe people continue to post incorrectly.

Short has $17M in dead cap. That’s the only thing you got right. Let me explain that you don’t reduce that at all. Only a complete idiot would think that.

If he plays with us this year, that dead cap is $6M in 2020 and $11M in 2021. If he plays with us this year we also pay $13M in NEW salary. So, to summarize, we lose $30M in cap space this year and next to keep a mediocre DT.

If we cut him now we get hit with the $17M in dead cap this year (not going to do the post June 1st cut as we don’t need that). We only lose $17M in cap space so we save $2M this year and $11M this year.

Only a complete idiot thinks cutting him only saves us $2M. That same idiot would probably be pissed that we had $11M in 2021 dead cap for Short.

I will reiterate this for anyone else that doesn’t get it. Dead cap comes from bonuses already paid that are spread over the life of the contract or years a player plays if released. You CANNOT reduce dead cap by paying the player another year or two of salary. All you are doing is pushing it out. It has to hit at some point and with rollover you absolutely save space to use later. Without rollover this is a different discussion and all that matters is if Tepper wants to write another $13M check to Short. 

Completely incorrect.  If we pay him he counts 19m towards the 2020 cap.  If we cut him he counts 17m towards the 2020 cap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Gotta have some kind of veteran leadership on the team, don’t really see us doing much here 

Some folks want an all-out rebuild which means, no veterans (aside from cheap scrubs to fill out the roster) and either cut or trade what decently talented vets we have left.  I even remember some crazy notion months about blowing the whole thing up and trading CMC before he got extended.

The idea of competing while rebuilding is 100% incompatible to some folks.  It's either you compete and not rebuild or rebuild and not compete.   The Panthers front office thinks both can occur simultaneously.  I guess we will see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/23/2020 at 11:55 AM, Mr. Scot said:

If this happens, I'd be real interested to see how it plays out in Washington.

You know how Rivera wants all of his veterans to have Hollywood endings.

I never underestimate Rivera's willingness to sacrifice others to save his own hide. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Damn the Tankers are already out here talking bout tanking?  
    • Looking Back at the 2021 Panthers Draft Class An NFL player's career on average is said to last just slightly over three years, and because of that, it's considered a general rule of thumb that by Year 3, a team knows what kind of professional football player a pick has developed into. While there are always exceptions to the rule, that's not the point of this topic. This is about the players who are still on the team after being picked up in the 2021 draft (or as UDFAs). Only four remain on the roster today: Jaycee Horn, Chuba Hubbard, Tommy Tremble, and Brady Christensen. Two of them signed significant contract extensions with the team (Horn, Hubbard) while the other two (Tremble, Christensen) received short-term deals that aren't cap-heavy. It's worth mentioning the conditions these guys entered the league under Matt Rhule's second year and Scott Fitterer's first. A ton of players were brought in that year, including a long snapper who didn't make the team… instead of Trey Smith, who just happens to be the Chiefs' starting guard (hey... to be fair to Thomas Fletcher, he did have a fun draft day phone call). These four survived Rhule and Reich and were seen as valuable enough under the first-year combo of Morgan and Canales to be rewarded with second deals. Jaycee Horn (Round 1, Pick 8.) Horn has all of the traits of a true CB1: elite footwork, physicality, and the ability to mirror WR1s... but his biggest challenge has been staying on the field. He's never finished an entire season, though to be fair, it's been rumored he wouldn’t have been shut down for the final two weeks of last season had the team been in playoff contention. He's got just 37 career games played over four seasons (with 15 of those coming in Morgan/Canales' Year 1). The team gambled on his production after seeing that not only can he lock down WR1s in man or match quarters, but he can also be dependable in a heavy cover-3 zone scheme like what the Panthers ran last season. With the recent free agent and draft additions made this offseason, expect Jaycee to go back to eliminating WR1s from the game rather than shutting down a third of the field like he was recently asked to do. Chuba Hubbard (Round 4, Pick 126) Originally seen as a depth pick with linear speed, Hubbard has outperformed expectations and emerged as the team's RB1 over the past couple of years. His 2023 breakout laid the foundation, but in 2024 he cemented his role as the lead back, showing much-improved vision, contact balance, and decisiveness in outside zone. He finished top-10 in missed tackles forced and yards after contact per attempt, all while holding his own in pass protection and producing on screens. Chuba doesn't have elite burst or wiggle, but he's carved out a spot as the leader and tone-setter in the run game. Not bad value for a Day 3 selection—positional value be damned. Tommy Tremble (Round 3, Pick 83) Tremble has been the kind of player every team needs but few talk about: dependable, physical, and quietly versatile. When he was drafted, he was already known for his blocking chops and has steadily improved as a receiver. He experienced his most complete season in 2024 with a 79.3% catch rate, 10.2 yards per reception, no drops, and a 108.9 passer rating when targeted. Not only that, he's been a consistent special teamer since coming into the league. He's a natural fit as a TE/FB hybrid in 12 and 13 personnel, consistently handling the dirty work in both run and pass situations. Brady Christensen (Round 3, Pick 70) BC has played all over the line both as a starter and as a back-up. We haven't seen the "short arms" come up as often as Rhule was worried about, especially against ATL and WAS where he logged over 100 snaps at center and posted his best grades of the year (76.0 OVR, 73.8 PBL, 75.8 RBLK vs. ATL; 85.2 OVR, 72.9 PBLK, 86.0 RBLK vs. WAS). While his overall pass-blocking grade (56.1) and lack of a consistent position might mean that he's the perfect OL6 rather than a long-term starter, he's been dependable when given his opportunities.
×
×
  • Create New...