Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kaepernick or Newton: Who gets a job first?


CanadianCat

Kaepernick or Newton: Who gets a job first?  

83 members have voted

  1. 1. Kaepernick or Newton: Who gets a job first?

    • Kaepernick
      25
    • Newton
      58


Recommended Posts

Given all the talk in the NFL right now that Kaepernick DESERVES a job, who do you think gets signed first?

 

Clearly, I think that the logical and better option HANDS DOWN is Newton but given the political/social state in the US right now I could see Kaepernick getting that option first... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is interesting about this topic is that not many teams are needy for a QB right now. So if one is signed before the season (my assumption is Kaep) it will be to send a message of support, and not in terms of need.

The other side to this is: how would you feel if you were Kaep and you were signed not because of your talent, but for a purpose? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mainstream media brainwashing people to think a guy who hasn't played since 2016 and was a borderline starting caliber QB is going to come back and start somewhere.  If the NFL wants to go far left and put politics above the product on the field, I could see it happening but this is just a cute story and nothing more.  At least the media got a few more million clicks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kap isn’t worth what he thinks he is, that’s the problem. He got a job offer from the Broncos after the 49ers but turned it down because he wanted more. Add to the fact he really isn’t that great and would need a strong supporting cast to be successful for that reason and being out of the game longer, he’d be a real tough signing for any team.

Cam is the same way. Until recently he didn’t even consider a back up role, which makes sense to me but starter spots are limited. I think he will get his shot. He has a lot more upside to Kap, it really isn’t close.

This is from a football perspective, as far as support/politics I’m not going to speculate what teams think about that. My considerations would revolve around talent and chance of success...you know, football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really comes down to which is more willing to take a low priced back-up QB gig. There just isn't a starting QB spot open and both would have a lot to prove before anyone would make the big move... for Cam it's that he is finally healthy, for Kaep it's is he still able to perform and you'd have to be gamble that he was better than his last work on the field was.

I still think Kaep will be the first with a job, or at least an offer. The PR win is too good not to take Kaep on (if he'll sign). Cam, I think, though, would be the better player once on the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's something else to consider with Kaepernick that I just thought about.  Would he get the MJ baseball treatment?  He obviously has a lot of people that agree with his political stance and I could see the players giving him information about the defense to make him appear better than he actually is.  If you consider this scenario, he could actually be a decent starter and might make it worth for a team to make him a starter.   Would it really be a bad investment for a team to pay him 15-20 mil for a 1 year deal?  I'd like to see it happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Great point.    I would lke to add that there is another QB on the roster who was terrible over the middle--Kenny Pickett.  
    • I don't think this is the year for Carolina, unfortunately.  I think they will have to make a decision on the QB position-all we know is that Bryce has year 5, but a long term deal has not been signed--yet--and they would be smart to take a "wait and see" approach.  I have not kept up, and I see a path to upside for Bryce, but I do not think we have aggressively pursued a QB when our QB was mediocre to worse than mediocre.  yes, his numbers are improving--but he has adapted by eliminating what he does poorly and not improving on what he does poorly.  Just my take and I have no data to support this view.   Basically, we go as Bryce goes, so the approach is not to bring in a QB to have him compete until we find one, but it is to make Bryce as good as he can be--is that good enough? Season ticket holders buy the hope of winning rings, not winning 8 games. Last year, Bryce had a resurgence.  Take away TMac and Rico Dowdle.  How good was he?  I still have hope.  Not a hater of plan A, but a hater because we have no plan B.
    • Yeah man, I've been here for a very very long time. Couldn't even begin to tell you what year. Maybe 2004 or 5? I've never really been super active, just enjoy reading everyone's opinions and discussions. I'll chime in from time to time. I have had a few different accounts over the years. It's always been a fun place for me to check in on my favorite team. Hopefully we can keep the place running for a long while still. I also would like to recommend bringing back the Lovely Ladies page!
×
×
  • Create New...