Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton calls out Panthers: 'You gonna choose that over this?'


Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, AggieLean said:

Cam isn’t going to have to be a backup. His path will be different than Teddys. 
 

Here comes the “fake concern” posts in regards to Bridgewater. Most only want Teddy as a bridge for Trevor Lawrence. I hope this elevates Teddy’s game, as I want him to stay. I have doubts on both though.

Exactly.

They think we can't see through their BS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, onmyown said:

He’s right this place is unbearable.

More threads and interest over the Patriots QB than the Panthers.

There has literally been zero discussion or even entertaining conversation regarding our current QB, coach and even players. And as a Panther fan, or for any Panther fan coming here for these things, should be discouraging. 

Just goes back to proving the point that half the people here were never fans to begin with. And for these people, it’s really not an issue (obviously).
 

 

Was this place unbearable for you when threads were made about Cam being jobless?

You Cam haters were on Cloud 9 when he was gone, but now you're pissed that he not only has a job, but he's with a winning organization like the Patriots. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BrizzMachete said:

I bet the cam haters mad cause now the whole world in cam corner and not just the panther fans . Lol 

It's fun to to speculate. Let Cam stay healthy for a season before you get too excited.

To throw shade at Teddy is classless. One of the most humble and likeable players in the league. Anyway, #5 is a Panther now. #1 is a Patriot. If you want to hug his nuts, I'm sure there is room on the Patriots bandwagon. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, AggieLean said:

Cam isn’t going to have to be a backup. His path will be different than Teddys. 
 

Here comes the “fake concern” posts in regards to Bridgewater. Most only want Teddy as a bridge for Trevor Lawrence. I hope this elevates Teddy’s game, as I want him to stay. I have doubts on both though.

Actually, from a strategic standpoint, it would be outstanding if Teddy did well and we could bypass any of the Qb's in next years draft.  Monster Olineman or LB or CB or DT or the best option for me, trade down and get several.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Cookie Lyon said:

Was this place unbearable for you when threads were made about Cam being jobless?

You Cam haters were on Cloud 9 when he was gone, but now you're pissed that he not only has a job, but he's with a winning organization like the Patriots. 

Joe Person on Greg Hardy's future - YouTube

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jfra78 said:

This is an extremely long offseason thanks to Covid-19.  There isnt much to talk about other than our former franchise and MVP QB signing with New England.  Seems the only ones who have a problem talking about him now are those who wanted him out in the first place.

Straight fiyah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sure he is the only NFL player working out in the off season so I am glad he is keeping fans up to date on that.  Most NFL guys look they have been working on their Dad bod all summer.  

I miss his videos of him walking on the treadmill before camp making him the hardest worker around.  I mean the old ladies in my hood walk an hour every morning but they don't insta it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t mind the Cam threads, it is easy not to click on them if you don’t want to read them. Everything is soooo slow right now anyway so I click on most threads to be honest.

The one thing that gets old is when Cam is constantly brought up in Panthers threads and it turns into another Cam discussion. Let’s just keep them separate and we should be good to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly what I was going to say. Brady seems to be taking a page out of Olsen's playbook, which is probably a good thing. They'll probably get around to giving Brady an Emmy one day, and he should thank Olsen for giving him the blueprint for success.
    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
×
×
  • Create New...