Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"Teddy will never be good enough" crowd


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

the metric for a franchise QB is the ability to put the team on his back, make everyone better, and carry them to a win.

the jury is out on teddy but we haven't seen that yet. we have seen likable, efficient, chippy chad pennington.

i hope his deep ball develops with the offensive gel and makes me eat my doubts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

That’s the same crowd saying we should trade Burns, calling Brown a bust, saying we look better without CMC, Etc. 

It’s not. I’m not sold on Teddy. He is winning me over. He can’t turn the ball over though. I haven’t made any threads about Burns, Brown or CMC in a negative light. Teddy is still on pace for like 16 passing TDs and that would be a career high. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Varking said:

It’s not. I’m not sold on Teddy. He is winning me over. He can’t turn the ball over though. I haven’t made any threads about Burns, Brown or CMC in a negative light. Teddy is still on pace for like 16 passing TDs and that would be a career high. 

So if you are one who is saying “Teddy will never be good enough” or are in that crowd, I consider you to be in the same category as ones who started threads about cmc, Burns, Brown etc. If you are not, I don’t put you in that category. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s kind of overrated to be honest. Never really felt like a true #1 or elevated his play to become a guy the defense really has to worry about. 
    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
×
×
  • Create New...