Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC for Le'Veon Bell & 1st Round Pick & More?


Teddy Time

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Teddy Time said:

There's a lot of projection going on with the idea of Trevor Lawrence as a Jet.  Jets and their fans aren't seeing Lawrence as necessary as many of you do.  Sam Darnold is in Year 3, and nearly all Jets fans view Gase as the problem and those that don't see Gase, it's the GM, or the o-line, or a million other things.  Sam Darnold isn't Mitch Trubisky.  there's no division in Jetsland within the team, the fans, or players.  They still believe Darnold is their guy.

as for being guaranteed the #1 pick come on.  Washington, the Jaguars, Lions, and several other teams are all working just as hard to lose games, and they all clearly want Trevor Lawrence.

So let’s say hypothetically, the Jets are all in on Sam Darnold and under no circumstances will take Lawrence.

They can trade the pick for CMC, a RB that is on a large contract, or they can trade it for 3 1sts and a couple 2nds. Choosing the RB in that scenario is malpractice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, joemac said:

OP do you have Donkey Brains?

Try reading the first and last line of the OP.  I'm hardly putting up billboards to make this happen.  It's just an idea.  If you're too narrow minded to explore ideas on what to do with an NFL team that's fine, but you don't have to be insulting about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Teddy Time said:

if i understand you right, you're saying the Jets would draft Lawrence and dump Darnold?  I don't think there's any evidence the Jets want to move on from Sam.

 It would be the dumbest thing to give CMC(the best RB in league) to another team with a trade. This thread is nothing but nonsense.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

You're right I owe birds an apology on behalf of the huddle I officially appogize to birds for insulting their intelligence.

Enough already.  How many posts have you made on here just to insult me?   Why don't you lighten the F up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah I'm still not sure about Canales' play calling but I'll give him another season. Still can't quite figure out why you think Young won't work out. His numbers with Theilen are as good as any QB Theien's ever had - including the three games he has started with Rogers this year. Cokers' numbers are as good as Theilens and he is an UDFA and TMac is in the run for ORTY with Young as his QB. Young's throwing more accurately now (from 21.5% in 23 to 16.5% this year) and he has shown he can make the throws in clutch moments. If you take into account he was saddled with XL, Chark, Mingo and Johnson for receivers at one point, had a coaching staff his first year that didn't want him and a current coach who is suspect at play calling, I'm not sure he has been as bad as people here say. I know he has had terrible moments/games but most qb's still on their rookie contract will.  Anyway, had to give my weekly BY plug. Guess I thought this was the perfect time lol.
    • He missed a lot of time. Was slow getting back up to speed. And we have an offense that is not exactly WR friendly so his targets were low.  How many targets does anyone get when you have 120 yards passing, 54 yards passing, 160 yards, most of the time? It probably took the time it needed to take.
    • The 5th year option jus gives them a little more time to make their decision and figure out the position going forward.  The idea that it means hes def gonna get a extension is asinine.
×
×
  • Create New...