Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Defense is two starters away from being very good.


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Oh, I think an upgrade at MLB and FS absolutely puts this group in the top 10. We're currently just outside he top 10 in both yardage (11th) and points allowed (13th).

Talk to me at the end of the season after the injuries start mounting.  Then you will know what you have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

The Bears rushed for a total of 28 and 35 yards in their 2 games leading up to the Panther game. The Chicago Bears were a one-dimensional team and, despite knowing they were going to be a pass-oriented offense, the Panthers had nothing yesterday.

No pressure on a quarterback who, when he ran yesterday, I thought I could beat in a foot race.

I'm still undecided on what this defense actually is.   I could go either way.   Or I mean we likely could be extremely average. I mean there are arguments that we have caught a lot of very lucky breaks that last 4 weeks that have made us look much better than we really are. 

rookie QB making his first start cross country, AZ team who WRs were banged up coming in and not practicing, a ATL team whose WRs were banged up/hurt, the Bears have one of the worst offenses in the NFL. 

I really like some of the guys up front.  I'm still not sold on the back 7 being able to get the job done vs good healthy offenses. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CRA said:

How cool would it be if in our next home game.....

Luke comes dropping in from the rafters like Sting back in the day....and makes his glorious return!!!!

See the source image

 

 

 

 

 

 

*gonna need Tepper to throw a roof up real quick for this to then have a shot. 

As long as he takes the bat to Whitehead and throws him through a table I’m all for it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Anybodyhome said:

The Bears rushed for a total of 28 and 35 yards in their 2 games leading up to the Panther game. The Chicago Bears were a one-dimensional team and, despite knowing they were going to be a pass-oriented offense, the Panthers had nothing yesterday.

No pressure on a quarterback who, when he ran yesterday, I thought I could beat in a foot race.

They got pressure on Foles.. What game were you watching?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Pantherxtreme said:

Our secondary has been fine, safeties included, losing Justin Burris might change that now.

Our biggest need is middle linebacker and another pass rushing De. We are not getting consistent pressure outside of Burns. 

Gross Matos, though injured, has had one of the highest pressure percentages in the league. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

The one with Carolina getting no sacks and one TFL (and that was on a RB) on an immobile QB.

Sacks and pressure are 2 different things.. You know that right?? The int and almost Int was due to pressure.. Foles was hit a more then  few times and forced out the pocket as well.. What game were you watching??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Sacks and pressure are 2 different things.. You know that right?? The int and almost Int was due to pressure.. Foles was hit a more then  few times and forced out the pocket as well.. What game were you watching??

As I said, the one with no sacks and 1 TFL. Against an immobile QB with no running game. 

The game Carolina lost because their defense was atrocious against a 1-dimensional team.

What game were you watching- the one you think they won?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WOW!! said:

They got pressure on Foles.. What game were you watching?

He probably meant not being able to get home and get a single sack vs a team the world knew wasn't going to be able to run the ball. 

but yeah, they got some pressure on slow and immobile Foles. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's handing off play calling duties to fuging Brad Idzik as well so, either that mouth breather can run the playbook and Canales can grow as an all around head coach or it will be a horrible decision and both of them and BY can screw off. I'm fine with that as long as it isn't just another excuse for BY to get another year with another coach worthy of working around his limitations as a qb. 
    • Not only for Andersen but the whole team, having not beat the Habs this season before tonite.  Shows them that they aren't jinxed.
    • I understand why people say things like it could be worse in relation to Tepper but it just doesn't jive for me. Are the optics bad? Yes. Would I want her to be the owner of my team? No. But I mean she's only been owner for a year and the Colts overall are a better run organization. As far as I know they've also never had the distinction of having the worst win percentage in all of professional sports either. Tepper has owned this team for 8 years and about the only thing that has been consistent has been the ability to continue to find different ways to achieve new lows. Even now people are saying things are different yada yada but we said these same things at certain points under Rhule Fitterer and Reich. I'm going to wait to see how the rubber meets the road this upcoming season before I make any strong conclusions about anything in relation to the longevity under this franchise going forward.
×
×
  • Create New...