Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Christian McCaffrey is dressed for practice today


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, imminent rogaine said:

I hope we keep putting in Davis in yard-to-go situations. We shouldn’t be losing because cmc and Armah can’t get a yard. 

We need to change our playcalling in those situations, regardless of who's on the field...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BrianS said:

But . . . but . . . Mike Davis can do the same things for less money . . . right?  right?

Welcome back 22, we missed you.

Theorized a while back that Davis might be one of those guys who can look really good in limited duty but starts to break down if too much of a workload is put on him.

To be clear, guys like that are valuable. You just have to know not to overuse them.

Put him back in the role of being a backup / relief / short yardage / change of pace back and he'll probably be fine (valuable even).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Daniel Jeremiah's top 50 players heading into the Combine.  Lol at the people still pining for Styles.  Dude will be LONG gone before our slot as I noted he would be.  Go ahead a keep drafting him at #19 if y'all want to keep ruining/making unrealistic mock drafts.   https://www.nfl.com/news/daniel-jeremiah-s-top-50-2026-nfl-draft-prospect-rankings-2-0
    • Kmet is better than just 'meh'.   Mayer took a back seat to Bowers and is another TE that would relish a chance to start again.  Sanders, Temble and Evans is a better group of TEs than we've fielded during the Ian Thomas era, but it's far from stacked.  That's the problem, our TE room has sucked for so long now that  being 'better than crap' is apparently good enough--which it is not.
    • Why? Feels like we got a whole TE crew of almost Kmets. Loveland surpassed Kmet easy and relegated Kmet to Tremble like stats. Kmet’s decent years were because of volume. Kmet had over 90 targets twice in his career. Tremble’s career high in targets is 37. Tremble could produce Kmet numbers with the same volume so why would you ever go for Kmet? Loveland or Bowers type studs, go for it. Meh TEs, we’ve got plenty.
×
×
  • Create New...