Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chinn out


Icege

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Icege said:

Dennis Daley starting at LT. Adarius Taylor starting at LB.

Thanks for this

Interesting!  The Little experiment is over, The pimple finally got popped (Whitehead--see what I did there?), and 20% of our tackling machine is out.

I think Daley has potential at T---let's hope he has a good game.  At SC he was inconsistent but improving--had a good final game vs Clemson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MHS831 said:

Thanks for this

Interesting!  The Little experiment is over, The pimple finally got popped (Whitehead--see what I did there?), and 20% of our tackling machine is out.

I think Daley has potential at T---let's hope he has a good game.  At SC he was inconsistent but improving--had a good final game vs Clemson

Updated with additional info. Little & Scott set to rotate as well. Very interested to see how Daley looks at LT after looking not-terrible at RT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Yeah, no

You need to understand a little bit about what it means to draft players to develop.  It does not take an engineering degree from MIT to know that most players are not NFL ready--and he has been hurt a lot.  You have to play them to find out.  Jeez. No point posing as the all knowing sage of common knowledge at this point.  Ok?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Thanks for this

Interesting!  The Little experiment is over, The pimple finally got popped (Whitehead--see what I did there?), and 20% of our tackling machine is out.

I think Daley has potential at T---let's hope he has a good game.  At SC he was inconsistent but improving--had a good final game vs Clemson

Taylor is filling in for Chinn. Whitehead still playing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...