Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Daley starting at LT


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, t96 said:

You can't really call Little a bust this early into his career. He was a 2nd round pick (yes I know we traded up). If he even becomes a solid swing tackle, that isn't a bust and is decent value for a 2nd rounder (especially relative to Hurney's 2nd round pick history). Of course, that's no guarantee that he can even become that but I'd give him another year or two before labelling him a bust.

Swing tackle isn’t pick 37, heck call it’s pick 29/30. Pick 47 and 77 that we gave up are first round value. Swing tackle for that is absolutely a bust. A backup role for first round value is a bust even if it’s a 15 year backup. There’s no sugar coating that career backups and 6th rounders (from the same draft) are go tos over your guy you traded first round value to get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, t96 said:

You can't really call Little a bust this early into his career. He was a 2nd round pick (yes I know we traded up). If he even becomes a solid swing tackle, that isn't a bust and is decent value for a 2nd rounder (especially relative to Hurney's 2nd round pick history). Of course, that's no guarantee that he can even become that but I'd give him another year or two before labelling him a bust.

If you're trading up to take a tackle in a weak tackle class that you graded as a first rounder, then he better be a grand slam. This is a Marty bust pick right up there with Armanti Edwards. Had a glaring need for a center and guard in high quality IOL filled draft and we whiff and miss yet again. Marty followed his gut and this is the result. 2 years later and we have Paradis the turnstile at C, Reed at G trying to find Waldo, and the 1st rd grade tackle that can't even muster average back to back games against decent competition. I wish someone could have seen this coming. Oh that's right. Almost the entire Huddle did. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

If you're trading up to take a tackle in a weak tackle class that you graded as a first rounder, then he better be a grand slam. This is a Marty bust pick right up there with Armanti Edwards. Had a glaring need for a center and guard in high quality IOL filled draft and we whiff and miss yet again. Marty followed his gut and this is the result. 2 years later and we have Paradis the turnstile at C, Reed at G trying to find Waldo, and the 1st rd grade tackle that can't even muster average back to back games against decent competition. I wish someone could have seen this coming. Oh that's right. Almost the entire Huddle did. 

@Waldo Has Reed located you yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Said it elsewhere, but I think seeing that it didn't take Matt Rhule the better part of a season to figure out that Greg Little wasn't getting it done is kind of encouraging to me.

Ron Rivera probably would have left him in there for the rest of the season and defended his performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Daniel Jeremiah's top 50 players heading into the Combine.  Lol at the people still pining for Styles.  Dude will be LONG gone before our slot as I noted he would be.  Go ahead a keep drafting him at #19 if y'all want to keep ruining/making unrealistic mock drafts.   https://www.nfl.com/news/daniel-jeremiah-s-top-50-2026-nfl-draft-prospect-rankings-2-0
    • Kmet is better than just 'meh'.   Mayer took a back seat to Bowers and is another TE that would relish a chance to start again.  Sanders, Temble and Evans is a better group of TEs than we've fielded during the Ian Thomas era, but it's far from stacked.  That's the problem, our TE room has sucked for so long now that  being 'better than crap' is apparently good enough--which it is not.
    • Why? Feels like we got a whole TE crew of almost Kmets. Loveland surpassed Kmet easy and relegated Kmet to Tremble like stats. Kmet’s decent years were because of volume. Kmet had over 90 targets twice in his career. Tremble’s career high in targets is 37. Tremble could produce Kmet numbers with the same volume so why would you ever go for Kmet? Loveland or Bowers type studs, go for it. Meh TEs, we’ve got plenty.
×
×
  • Create New...