Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Falcons Waive Takk McKinley


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Proudiddy said:

Not really.  It seems a big part of his problem is effort though...  and, they just waived him after he tweeted the organization were "clowns" for not trading him.

It gets juicier.

He's implying they were clowns for not trading him because he himself recognizes himself as a bust

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:

Falcons gonna Falcon.  He wasn't going to be back anyway.  Way too crazy for me.  I don't blame him for wanting out of the dumpster fire that is Atlanta, but this just looks like an AB situation without the proven production.

Ever since that draft interview, I thought he could be a headcase.  It seemed like they were really high on him up until this year though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kinda split on this. He’s clearly a head case to some degree and I’d probably want to stay away from that in our locker room. But it’d also be pretty damn a awesome to sign him and have him fit in here well and show that it was a Falcons problem, not a Takk problem. Though I suspect it’s more likely that he winds up like Vic Beasley... Would probably pass but if we did claim him I would be cautiously optimistic about it as a low risk flyer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In all honesty, no one knows if Dan really pushed for Bryce to be drafted. It's not fair to Dan to say that just because he was a part of the Fitterer regime then he was in full support of drafting Bryce. If the HC, Reich at the time really wanted Stroud but got bullied into drafting Bryce then Dan had even less say so in the matter. Dan was also saddled with giving Bryce an opportunity to compete in years 2/3 because of the cost to trade up and get him by ownership.  Outside of managing the QB position, Dan has made good moves and built a decent roster. Solidified the O-line and D-line, drafted contributors, and made good trades (Mike Jackson), and free agent signings (Dowdle). I do believe that this offseason will be really important for Dan and we'll see whose side he is clearly on. Bryce has had plenty of time and opportunity to prove himself and he has failed, if Dan is a Bryce homer he'll give him another year and pick up the 5th year option. If Dan isn't a Bryce homer, he'll move on from Bryce. Either way, we'll find out this offseason. 
    • You also have to extend him and probably deal/cut Bryce 
    • Jones would be what he is if he was on this team, a fairly middle of the road game manager. Still and upgrade but probably not worth the price the 49ers may want for him. If it's not something stupid in terms of ask and he doesn't want something even more stupid in terms of longish term contract, I am okay with a middling game manager until we can do better through the draft. The one thing that wouldn't be terrible is some stability at QB. That has almost never happened under Tepper.
×
×
  • Create New...