Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Article: Matt Rhule not happy with Teddy Bridgewater for fumbling at the goal line


WarPanthers89

Recommended Posts

Normally coach gives praise even when players are performing terrible (see Whitehead) so it’s odd that he has called out Teddy 2 weeks in a row. I believe we are absolutely looking for a QB in the draft.

Post:

Panthers coach Matt Rhule was not happy with quarterback Teddy Bridgewater for a costly fumble in Saturday night’s loss to the Packers.

With the Panthers down 14-3 and facing first-and-goal at the 1-yard line, Rhule called for a quarterback sneak. Bridgewater initially got stopped at the line but reached the ball forward, at which point it was knocked out of his hands. The Packers recovered and ran it back all the way across midfield, setting up a touchdown that gave Green Bay a 21-3 lead.

Rhule said afterward that Bridgewater needs to know not to reach the ball out at the goal line unless it’s fourth down.

“We don’t reach the ball over the goal line until fourth down. It’s just kind of a principle. We don’t do it. We never do it,” Rhule said, via SI.com. “You get to the moment and you can’t do new things. You know, you are at Lambeau in December playing a good team. You just have to trust yourself. I’m not talking about just Teddy, but the whole team. That play was emblematic. You talk about dramatic shift. Had he done that on fourth down, I can live with it, just not on first down, especially when I think we ran the ball well when we did run it tonight. That’s just a principle of our team. We don’t reach the ball across the goal line until fourth down.”

Packers coach Matt LaFleur said of Bridgewater’s fumble, “That was the play of the game, no doubt about it.” It was a great play for LaFleur’s team, and a terrible play for Rhule’s team.

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2020/12/20/matt-rhule-not-happy-with-teddy-bridgewater-for-fumbling-at-the-goal-line/

A85ED99E-7643-43B5-B694-7811318D8F39.jpeg

7741FC56-AFB2-4671-9083-D61CDF302A68.jpeg

D3DEE854-EDF3-4088-83C5-0D3FE59C1489.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I firmly believe if we had a good qb in this exact same roster even with all the new players and coaches this would be a 9 or 10 win team instead of a 4 or 5 win team.

If they keep teddy and keep improving the roster (if that's the route they want to go ) , well be a 6-10 to 9-7 ish team and won't have a decent chance at getting a top 10 pick and a premier QB . 

Worst thing they can do is keep him and improve everything else and continue the mediocrity parade that's been going on for 25 years already. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 of the 10 losses we have were by 1 score or less. With a good (not even great, just a good qb) were looking at a probably a 10-4  team instead of a 4-10 team . 

Defense is massively improving might only need a couple more key pieces and some decent role players. Offensive line needs to be rebuilt as well . But the most important piece we are missing is QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

Maybe he should focus on the mistake his staff did on evaluating some of his current players.

Seriously. TB isn’t jumping over any dline LOL. Granted it was stupid to reach over the line but you reap what you sow.

 I am sure Rhule is aware of the issues. The defense actually did better than I thought and the oline wasn’t great but better in the sense they didn’t completely disappear second half of the game.

Leaving in Whitehead until this point was dumbfounding.

The FO is truly  going to have to HATE Lance, Trask and Wilson if they don’t end up drafting one. No doubt they’re taking a hard look at them though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...