3 QBs in the top 4?

[Growl]

If atlanta outbids you for the 3rd pick, then fine

Better to make them pay for it then just give them a franchise QB. 

[SmittysLawnGuy]

Anyone watch the question proposed to Matt Rhule last week about fans being pissed we won. I found it hilarious. If you can read body language and facial expressions. He basically said I tried. The Skins were just that bad. I can't even fault the front office. We would have had to start running the wrong way to lose that. Ronny Rivera was that inept.

[TheProcess]

20 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Not sure if the Dolphins budge from 3 if Sewell is in their lap.

Would be a lot like Washington last year with Chase Young

Sewell is a great talent, but Miami just drafted 3 rookies last year that all started this year. 

That team better get Tua some weapons. They have one good receiver in Parker who stays injured half the time. They absolutely should trade back and take Smith/Chase 

[Growl]

16 minutes ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

Oh yea? Tell me the last time a trade like that worked out in favor of the team trading up? Look at recent drafts and all the "franchise Qbs" that are currently playing only a few of them were drafted in the top 10. You don't need to mortgage the future to find your Qb if anything it hurts you more than it helps.

"The teams that have a quarterback picked in the Top 5 on their roster (the Browns, Dolphins, Bengals, Jets, Rams, Cardinals, Bears, Lions, Eagles, Pats, and Falcons) have a combined record of 67-87-2 this season."

lol what an awful post with a cherry picked statistic

 

you listed teams with rookie QBs, you listed team with QBs who they themselves didn't even draft, you listed teams with QBs with exceptional careers with sustained success and distilled it down to one season 

What do you get when you remove all those? 

 

A few playoff teams and the new York jets

[MadHatter]

24 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

This. We are in a great spot to trade up without it crippling us for years to come. If you have a guy you like, that you feel can be your franchise QB for years to come, you absolutely go for it.

Moving up 6 spots to 3 would cost a fortune...

[WarPanthers89]

16 minutes ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

Not true because of the steep compensation teams would want to accept that trade.

I wouldn’t consider a future 1st crippling our team if we get a franchise QB. At 8 we could have someone call to us and if not it’s not going to kill us to trade up for who we want. 

[jfra78]

If we really want a QB we better trade to 3.  If we can't get to 3 then BPA, the rest of the QBs aren't worth it

[Jon Snow]

All QBs will be taken before we pick.  Haven't you heard?

[WarPanthers89]

14 minutes ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

Oh yea? Tell me the last time a trade like that worked out in favor of the team trading up? Look at recent drafts and all the "franchise Qbs" that are currently playing only a few of them were drafted in the top 10. You don't need to mortgage the future to find your Qb if anything it hurts you more than it helps.

"The teams that have a quarterback picked in the Top 5 on their roster (the Browns, Dolphins, Bengals, Jets, Rams, Cardinals, Bears, Lions, Eagles, Pats, and Falcons) have a combined record of 67-87-2 this season."

Mahomes comes to mind. Again we are in a good spot to have one of the top 4 rated QBs fall to us, but if we have a guy we fall in love with, we are within striking distance to get a trade pulled off without it killing us.

[nctarheelreincarnated]

19 minutes ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

Not true because of the steep compensation teams would want to accept that trade.

@Montsta

This is one of those people that actually wanted Carolina to beat Washington for a “winning culture.” 

[Mr Mojo Risin]

31 minutes ago, Growl said:

lol what an awful post with a cherry picked statistic

 

you listed teams with rookie QBs, you listed team with QBs who they themselves didn't even draft, you listed teams with QBs with exceptional careers with sustained success and distilled it down to one season 

What do you get when you remove all those? 

 

A few playoff teams and the new York jets

I'd include others but unfortunately they are already out of the NFL. It doesn't take a genius (or maybe it does knowing this board) to understand that trading up for a "cant miss franchise Qb" has almost never worked out.

And awww crying about cherry picked stats? The record doesn't lie most teams get their Franchise Qbs outside of the top 10 that's a fact no matter how bad you want to cry about it

[stbugs]

29 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Not sure if the Dolphins budge from 3 if Sewell is in their lap.

Would be a lot like Washington last year with Chase Young

He said if the Jets pass on Fields. I assume that means they take Sewell. I guess it could mean they take Wilson but I think if the Jets pass on Fields it’s because they are sticking with Darnold and adding Sewell and other weapons since they do have an extra 1st and pick 34.

[nctarheelreincarnated]

4 minutes ago, MadHatter said:

Moving up 6 spots to 3 would cost a fortune...

That developing winning culture was worth the win. Thank God. 

[WarPanthers89]

4 minutes ago, MadHatter said:

Moving up 6 spots to 3 would cost a fortune...

5 spots (we currently sit at 8 and could be 7 if the eagles win) but like I’ve said before we are in a great spot so have one of the top 4 QBs fall to us. If we are in love with someone at 3 I wouldn’t care giving up a 1st in order to get a franchise QB who will lead out team for years to come if it works out.