Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New Feature - Automatic Moderation

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Zod Grand Master

Zod

Posted
Posted

We have a new feature here that will help us moderate this joint and I am testing it out. 

If 5 huddlers report the same post, it will automatically hide the post until the mod team can look at it. 

Please, do not abuse this. This is a tool that could really help us out and improve this place. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zod Grand Master

Zod

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, Jesse said:

Also, the text in the in mobile reply box is centered middle when typing posts. It seems a little off balance since posts are centered left.

Yeah, I fat fingered some code this morning. thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites
1of10Charnatives Mentor

1of10Charnatives

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, Zod said:

We have a new feature here that will help us moderate this joint and I am testing it out. 

If 5 huddlers report the same post, it will automatically hide the post until the mod team can look at it. 

Please, do not abuse this. This is a tool that could really help us out and improve this place. 

*reports this post.*

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zod Grand Master

Zod

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, NAS said:

Cool feature but I think 5 is too low of a threshold. 10 seems more abuse proof.

 

There are hardly ever any posts that get multiple reports. Not sure any has ever gotten 10. If people start using it we can adjust on the fly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PhillyB Grand Master

PhillyB

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, NAS said:

Cool feature but I think 5 is too low of a threshold. 10 seems more abuse proof.

how many posts actually get reported though? i feel like only actual abusive/flagrantly racist posts actually get any kind of flag. people are still happy to just poo posts they don't like 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NAS Grand Master

NAS

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

how many posts actually get reported though? i feel like only actual abusive/flagrantly racist posts actually get any kind of flag. people are still happy to just poo posts they don't like 

I think more people will report a post than just pooing it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LinvilleGorge
      Mini camp tweets

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • LinvilleGorge
      BREAKING: Panthers interested in Justin Simmons

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...