Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Prime Tom Brady or Prime Aaron Rodgers - Who would you want?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Give him the weapons some of these guys had, and I'll take Marino and whip all your asses!

I will say this though: Brady's weapons weren't all-world. 

Marino was damn good.

He could make a decision in a fraction of a second and put the ball in the exact right spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TSLA said:

Are you going to ban me because I don’t agree with you just so you can sleep at night?  Like I said, good night dude.

The reason why everyone knows it's you every time you crawl back is because you immediately go back to your same old BS. Post stupid poo, insinuate everyone else is stupid for not agreeing with your stupid poo, then cry foul.

Good night indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, TSLA said:

Not funny to the guys who know football. 

I know football, and I find it very funny.

Wilson is a good quarterback, but he's not Aaron Rodgers good.

The only guy in the league right now that I could see placing over Aaron Rodgers is maybe Patrick Mahomes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prime Rodgers for the following reasons:

  • Brady had Belichick as his coach up until this season. Belichick is one of, if not the, greatest coaches in NFL history. I won't argue who was more important to the success of the team, but the fact that they both had each other was beneficial for everyone involved. Rodgers had Mike McCarthy up until last year. Two coaches in different stratospheres. 
  • Rodgers is the most efficient QB in NFL History. He has 412 TDs to 89 interceptions (4.6 ratio). That's INSANE. For perspective, Tom brady is the second best at efficiency at 589 TDs to 191 INTs (3.04). If Aaron Rodgers threw an interception on his next 46 consecutive passes, he would still have a better career ratio than Brady.
  • Rodgers is more mobile
  • Rodgers has a stronger arm
  • Rodgers doesn't have to deal with family drama because he doesn't talk to his. Less off field distractions.
  • Brady has a weird health cult going on

Brady is the GOAT but Rodgers is the BOAT. Brady has had more overall success because he has had the benefit of playing with one of the best coaches of all time. Rodgers has had more individual success because he has dragged his teams, coaches, and organization to wins against their will at times. Rodgers said it himself "Down years for me are career years for most quarterbacks", and he's not wrong. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Seeing Mike McCarthy in Dallas this year makes me wonder how Green Bay got anywhere with him.

Lotta people said it was Rodgers.

it was reported that towards the end of their time together Rodgers would straight up ignore the plays McCarthy was calling because he knew they were garbage and would call his own. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Inimicus said:

Terrell Davis would like to have a word

That comment was focused on Elways' early years, he carried the team to the playoffs/superbowl with no help. Similar to that one time LeQueen did it before he went superteam BS. AI is a better example, but in NFL, its near impossible to name someone carrying a team more than Elway for his first 10 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's be completely honest about this... Our WR room is AT and a bunch of question marks. Thielen is the only guy we know who knows the route tree completely, understands play calls and can regularly get open/beat close coverage when necessary. He's long in the tooth, isn't the speediest guy on the field but he plays like a pro, starting level wide receiver. Xavier, last season looked great at first, but man he kind of petered out down the stretch and would disappear in a number of games. He wasn't reliable on routes or getting open and where he was supposed to be a king at contested catches, he often looked a bit intimidated. I'm not saying he's a washout by any means. Anyone with his size, speed and catch radius could make it big in the NFL, but can he do it? He'll need to show more than he did in the preseason before we can really rely on him as a WR1 or WR2.  Coker was a revelation last season, he really played way above his (non)draft status and flashed multiple times in games and was a steady performer. What we need to find out, though, is whether he was benefiting from being an unknown that wasn't getting maximum effort from opposing DBs or if he was just outworking and outhustling everyone on the field. We should find out this season. We sure as hell didn't find out much in the pre-season (from him or any receiver or QB for that matter). He's still a question mark, but I think he has the look of the real deal. He might be this generation's next Thielen. Now, let's talk about Tet. High first round draft pick, first true WR off the board this year. Stellar career out west in college. Has the swagger of the WR1. And man, y'all are going to get mad about this but... he comes across as a mook. And in the pre-season he performed, well, not so great against poor opposition of second and third stringers. Yeah, he caught that one moonshot ball in the first game but really, nothing else lighting the place up. Rookie endzone drop in that game, too. He's still young and adjusting, I'm sure, but I was hoping to see something of a breakthrough kind of guy. I'm still looking. Hunter Renfro? Gosh, I hope he can make the team and make a comeback to his old form. It would be such a great story. But maybe neither one of those happens. We won't know until Tuesday and then, if he makes it past there it could be weeks. So, TL;DR: AT is all we can bank on right now. We couldn't afford to let him go considering the number of unknowns we'd be throwing out there for our QB, who himself is still an unknown. One thing to add: Our receivers coaching group has their work cut out for them. I hope they are up to the task, but the pre-season gave me little reason to believe in them. And I really need something to believe in here in Carolina.  
    • Same I think Randsom is a baller..... hopefully we don't have to suffer through 4-8 games of Scott blowing azz to get him on the feild.
    • Linebacker is the biggest need - I hope we figure out a way to address it. Krys Barnes is the only one who even moderately flashed.  Super nervous about Trevin/Rozeboom as a duo (Still like Trevin) I'd be excited if we had a better vet to mentor Trevin.  Or a better younger guy to support Rozeboom.  They just don't fit well and it may be a big problem against the run, even with our DL much improved. 
×
×
  • Create New...