Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rapoport: Panthers expected to be in the mix for Watson.


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Toomers said:

Why would they want to make the same mistake as the Panthers and overpay a backup to be a bridge to the starter they just took. And give up anything of trade value for it? 

Think about this, we Trade for Watson... guess who is still on the team and is literally the backup QB? Teddy is not exactly a trade asset but there’s no way that trade happens without sending Teddy to the Texans. You really think we afford Watson and Teddy on this roster??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Toomers said:

Why would they want to make the same mistake as the Panthers and overpay a backup to be a bridge to the starter they just took. And give up anything of trade value for it? 

Think about this, we Trade for Watson... guess who is still on the team and is literally the backup QB? Teddy is not exactly a trade asset but there’s no way that trade happens without sending Teddy to the Texans. You really think we can afford Watson and Teddy on this roster?? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

I’m not race baiting. I’m giving y’all the truth. It’s not even entirely about race. It’s more about relationships. If you don’t understand the relationship between Cam and Deshaun then I can’t articulate it any better for you. He’s not coming to a team that fuged over his mentor. It’s that simple. Y’all can have fun speculating but it’s not happening. poo on my posts all day long. Doesn’t change the facts. 

Can you please ban him mods.  This is ridiculous 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, shaq said:

Think about this, we Trade for Watson... guess who is still on the team and is literally the backup QB? Teddy is not exactly a trade asset but there’s no way that trade happens without sending Teddy to the Texans. You really think we afford Watson and Teddy on this roster??

You’re taking a 10M cap hit for TB even if some team wanted to pay his 10M guaranteed base salary and let the Panthers include him in a trade. It would cost an extra 4-5th rounder to entice them to eat it over giving an Andy Dalton 3M as a bridge. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Zod said:

 

 

tell me more the office GIF

That’s a weak race bait case. I could have outright said it. I made it PG13. I understand that you have a base here that can’t discuss race in a professional manner, but to ignore the reason he wants out of Houston in the first place isn’t presenting all sides of the topic. I’m always going to bring the real and won’t apologize for it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AceBoogie said:

That’s a weak race bait case. I could have outright said it. I made it PG13. I understand that you have a base here that can’t discuss race in a professional manner, but to ignore the reason he wants out of Houston in the first place isn’t presenting all sides of the topic. I’m always going to bring the real and won’t apologize for it. 

 

D34F3E7F-746D-42A2-9660-D0AC5E1A0362.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, shaq said:

Think about this, we Trade for Watson... guess who is still on the team and is literally the backup QB? Teddy is not exactly a trade asset but there’s no way that trade happens without sending Teddy to the Texans. You really think we can afford Watson and Teddy on this roster?? 

We'd probably have to cut him. He's a $20M cap hit if we release him (vs. $23M if he's on the roster), $15M if we designate him a post-June 1st cut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Fill me in...

What exactly happened with the relationship between Cam and the Panthers? 

Oh you mean at the end when Cam called them liars? When he said they gave up on him? When he felt like they jeopardize his ability to sign with a team early in free agency? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

That’s a weak race bait case. I could have outright said it. I made it PG13. I understand that you have a base here that can’t discuss race in a professional manner, but to ignore the reason he wants out of Houston in the first place isn’t presenting all sides of the topic. I’m always going to bring the real and won’t apologize for it. 

You accuse "ya'll" (meaning all of us) of being racist then you state we are the ones that cannot discuss race in a professional manner. 

I understand your point. Yes, there is some racist element in our fan base. But to boil it down to "ya'll" then expect anyone to care what you have to say afterwards when you just insulted them isn't a great strategy for civil discourse. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, TheProcess said:

Joe Brady was said to have a good interview in Houston. The Houston job is still open. Joe Brady is still available to be hired as a head coach. Joe Brady likes Teddy Bridgewater. I see a perfect scenario! 

The people he had the good interview with aren't in charge of the coaching hire anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Zod said:

You accuse "ya'll" (meaning all of us) of being racist then you state we are the ones that cannot discuss race in a professional manner. 

I understand your point. Yes, there is some racist element in our fan base. But to boil it down to "ya'll" then expect anyone to care what you have to say afterwards when you just insulted them isn't a great strategy for civil discourse. 

That’s fair criticism. I thought people could eliminate themselves from the “y’all” if they aren’t indeed racist. But history tells us that there are more “y’all’s” than less. I’m not looking to have a full blown race discussion. So fair enough. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...