Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you be upset with an all O-line / D-line / LB draft


TheBigKat

Recommended Posts

watching teams succeed in the playoffs it starts with:

Run the ball

Get after the quarterback

Solid interior D play

 

Carolina is DEPLETED on the O-line and unless you have a SUPERSTAR QB who can make an average QB look amazing then no matter who you have at QB won't matter. 

Carolina is LOADED with skilled offensive pieces (Robby, CMC, DJ and the soon to depart Samuel) what they needed the most is a clean pocket

LT- has not been addressed in ages, in this team's entire existence our only stable LT was Gross. If Sewell drops beyond 3, you go up and get him

LG/RG- can be addressed with your street FAs, needle in haystack players

C- Paradis graded 63.4, given his contract the easier play is for a late round C this year to replace him next year

RT- Moton.... guys like him aren't easily found

 

Onto the D-line

Carolina has the composition in the making of a ferocious D-line, something to the likes of Peppers/Rucker/Jenkins/Buckner or Hardy/Johnson good!

DE- set with YGM and Burns

DT- bye to KK, need to build with a pass rushing DT to pair with El Toro Brown and Kerr is your rotational DT (this year's version of Kyle Love)

ILB- complete mess, if Sewell can't be had and Micah is on the board, that's your guy. The Panthers have been snake bitten by having amazingly talented ILB play lost too early to injury (Beason/Kuech/Morgan). We need a bruiser in the middle, an enforcer who can learn from Kuech on reading plays

 

While drafting a QB is essential, this team CAN compete without a rookie QB. You build a team this year and if Teddy B can't wield the team to the playoffs in 2021 season then you pull a KC/Phi/BAL/Buffalo next year to pull off something like this

  • Josh Allen — Buffalo Bills sent their own 2018 first rounder (No. 12 overall) to move up to seventh overall, also giving up two second-round picks and getting the No. 255 overall pick from the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.
  • Lamar Jackson — Baltimore Ravens gave up a second- and a fourth-round pick in 2018, along with their 2019 second-round pick, to the Philadelphia Eagles in exchange for the No. 32 overall pick in 2018, along with Philly’s fourth-round selection.
  • Chiefs surrendered two first-round picks (one in 2017 and one in 2018), as well as a third-round pick, to the Bills to move up to the No. 10 spot to grab Mahomes.

Giving away that kind of draft capital from now and the core of the team isn't solid yet makes no sense to me

 

Thoughts?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

give me oregon's left tackle then roll with it. or move moton to left tackle, draft a right tackle. paradis has got to go, def draft someone late to fill that roll they'll be around. We need a corner opposite jackson. someone tall and physical. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would I be upset?  Probably not.  It would mean whoever is available at QB when we pick is not somebody Rhule and company really want.  No need to reach, nobody is expecting a Super Bowl run in 2021.

Whether Parsons would be my pick at #8 or not depends on who goes in picks #1-7.  Somebody ahead of us is going to draft Sewell.  That would strike my #1 choice, assuming Lawrence lasts about 30 seconds into the first round. 

I keep an eye on thedraftnetwork prospect rankings (for better or worse), and if you assume the top 7 prospects go in the top 7 spots (which never, ever happens), we are looking at a choice of Pitts (#8 on their list), Darrisaw, Farley, Lance, Surtain, or Parsons being available (in that order).  Any of them would fit a position of need. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean, all the teams in the playoffs have QBs too minus Washington and Chicago. It starts there. You can improve your team everywhere like you said, but if you don’t have a QB, who cares? 
 

Look at the last 4 teams in and their QBs.... Rodgers, Brady, Mahomes, and Allen. You can succeed with depletion on most of those areas. You can’t without an elite QB. Not in today’s NFL. 
 

So to answer your question, no. I want a franchise QB and this is the year to get it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SazmoRanger said:

I mean, all the teams in the playoffs have QBs too minus Washington and Chicago. It starts there. You can improve your team everywhere like you said, but if you don’t have a QB, who cares? 
 

Look at the last 4 teams in and their QBs.... Rodgers, Brady, Mahomes, and Allen. You can succeed with depletion on most of those areas. You can’t without an elite QB. Not in today’s NFL. 
 

So to answer your question, no. I want a franchise QB and this is the year to get it. 

So you are willing to give up current draft capital this year for that QB not named Lawrence/Fields/Wilson?

Or would you rather build out the team core and next year blow that kind of draft capital?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheBigKat said:

So you are willing to give up current draft capital this year for that QB not named Lawrence/Fields/Wilson?

Or would you rather build out the team core and next year blow that kind of draft capital?

Me personally, I want Lance. I feel he has a chance to be there at 8. If our coaches and Fitterer don’t think he will and are totally sold on a QB, I don’t mind trading the draft capital, no. 
 

I don’t want to end up in 3-4 years like a team like the Bears, WFT, Dolphins, etc who are elite at most positions except the most important. If a QB you love is there or in striking distance, you go get him. The teams above that need a QB are going to have to give up a hell of a lot more than we would if we trade with say The Bengals and just move up 3 spots. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would not be upset. I absolutely believe we need a true starting QB, but I don't like the idea of mortgaging the future on someone that still might not pan out. If he's there, take him, but don't give away a bunch of picks to do it. Kansas City was a really good team with an okay QB. Getting Mahomes was what made them complete. We're nowhere close to that yet. I am okay with trying to be competitive with Teddy for one more year if we can build the team through the draft to the point where once we get our QB of the future he's basically plug and play. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Panther'sBigD said:

I would not be upset. I absolutely believe we need a true starting QB, but I don't like the idea of mortgaging the future on someone that still might not pan out. If he's there, take him, but don't give away a bunch of picks to do it. Kansas City was a really good team with an okay QB. Getting Mahomes was what made them complete. We're nowhere close to that yet. I am okay with trying to be competitive with Teddy for one more year if we can build the team through the draft to the point where once we get our QB of the future he's basically plug and play. 

 

KC was a playoff team with Alex Smith, they weren't sitting in the low teens when they moved up for Mahomes. I definately love their model of building

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Prowler2k18 said:

If one of the top QBs or Sewell doesn’t make it to #8 and Parsons or Surtain are BPA, you run that card to the podium. You can never go wrong going BPA. Afterward, we definitely need to give attention to OL.

How often does the perceived "BPA" end up actually being the BPA on an NFL field?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Lol. He may not be the prototype LT but he is solid. Your takes are embarrassing. IDGAF about anything in the NCAA but prospects. Still pining for Datnold is freaking hilarious. Ickey's weakness is passprotect from speed. He is smart and has room to improve a bit in his weakness but he is a beast in the run game. That's worth more than your willing to admit. I would still take him over everything since Gross so just GTFO of here with that weak and sad take. 
    • Oops. Sorry for the double post. I have been trying to finish this amid honey-do this and that for the last couple of hours.
    • First, let me say that some people aren't going to like this. Not because they don't enjoy reading a tongue-in-cheek article based on hints of truth, but because at times, this seems like a more mean-spirited version.  It also has an error regarding Tetairoa McMillan's 40 time at the NFL Combine, and the writer also somehow thinks that throwing in a standalone sentence that references Dave Canales and his past struggle with porn addiction is funny. Deadspin went through it's trials and tribulations, and many key people started and went to Defector. Defector is supposed to be an improvement, but I don't know that it is based upon this...satire? The following are snippets. On the team in general: If it still seems impossible to you that this team won five games, well, you're onto something. That mildly respectable 4-5 finish to the season only looks worse the longer you stare at it: They eked out back-to-back wins against the putrid Saints and Giants by a combined four points, and then needed overtime and a heroic Chuba Hubbard performance to beat the Cardinals. The final win of the season, Week 18's 44-38 overtime victory against a Falcons team that was trying to make the playoffs, can be counted as legitimately impressive for as long as it takes you to remember that the Falcons will always be frauds. On Dave Canales:  "Canales, meanwhile, has an alarming amount of swagger for a guy who was a few fluky late-season wins away from presiding over the worst team in the league. "The sky's the limit for this group," Canales said at the start of training camp. "This is going to be a very competitive team. I don't think people are going to want to play us by the style of football that we play. I'm expecting that." OK pal, take it easy." "The story those quotes come from is a fun read, due to how hard it strains to recast a season that was 90 percent disaster as some kind of meaningful step forward. Benching Young after Week 2, an obvious panic move that was almost certainly undertaken at Tepper's direction, is retrofitted to be "a gutsy move that defines Canales." Who needs winning seasons or division titles when you can put "Benched my QB in Week 2 and then put him back in the lineup because the other guy got injured" under the Gutsy Moves That Define Me section of a résumé. This man will have a job for life. I'm expecting that." On Bryce: "Young is entering his third season as the Panthers' starting quarterback, which is about the time you expect a guy who was drafted No. 1 overall to start demonstrating that he's capable of being the franchise savior he was selected to be. Young has 28 career starts under his belt, and it's pretty hard to find anything from those games indicating that he's going to avoid being a bust. He's thrown for more than 300 yards in a game just once, and tossed more than two TDs in a game twice. He's started 11 games in which his completion percentage was below 60 percent, and he's had 17 starts in which he couldn't crack 200 yards through the air. Beyond all that, he looks like he doesn't belong on the field. His base state is panic, he can't throw the ball downfield or to the sidelines, and he can barely hold his head upright under the weight of his helmet." On David Tepper: "David Tepper hasn't even been here for a decade and he's already threatening to go down as one of the worst owners in league history. A fanbase fully souring on an owner usually takes some time—there's a few seasons constituting a honeymoon period, then a period of excuse-making, and then the feeling starts to shift once the losing seasons and annoying quotes pile up. Tepper is an argument against the idea that familiarity breeds contempt; sometimes all you need is one look at a guy before deciding that you'd like to punch him in the face."   There's some truth here, and I'm sure that to the Negative Nancys the portrayal is spot on, but remember that this is ostensibly coming from a satirical perspective. The "truth" hurts though, and hopefully, like every season, there's still plenty of hope and optimism. At the end of the day, we just don't know how the m infusion of acquisitions and young players is going to work out.
×
×
  • Create New...