Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fox analyst says he heard that Watson has interest in Panthers!


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Everyone clamoring for Watson hasn't factored in the cost or lack therof in signing all of our core young guy's when their contract comes up.   

A decent chunk of those guys are going to be due near the end of Watson's deal. 

If we do or don't do a deal with Watson(looking increasingly unlikely if the reports of the Jets and Dolphins being his two preferred destinations are accurate) some hard decisions will have to be made on those guys. I don't think you will see DJ Moore, Brian Burns, Jeremy Chinn and Derrick Brown all in Carolina Panthers uniforms in six years.

We can make a deal happen but the biggest issue is whether it is worth it. If we could reasonably dump one or more of our bad contracts in the deal(Teddy, CMC, Shaq) it would be. However, those are three of the least tradeable contracts in the NFL. Furthermore, even if we could get someone interested in CMC, trading him nukes our cap for the next 3 years.

I look at the Watson trade talk basically like getting a lottery ticket, the biggest benefit is likely just the few days you get to think about what you would do of it actually happened.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Everyone clamoring for Watson hasn't factored in the cost or lack therof in signing all of our core young guy's when their contract comes up.   

This is silly.

We'd be in the same situation with any franchise QB, not just Watson.  To win in the NFL, you have to have a franchise QB.  To have a franchise QB (unless they are on a rookie deal, in which case you're probably only getting a year or two of high level play before you have to pay them), you have to pony up the cap space to keep them on the roster.  And allocating that cap space to a franchise QB means having to make tough decisions about other players that also need to get payed. You can either pay all the top guys and skimp on depth, only keep the QB and try to spread around the remaining cap around a larger of mid-level guys, try to stagger and structure deals so that the cap hits vary year to year to fit it all in under the cap, or hope to draft well enough that you're constantly getting outsized contributions for your dollars from players on rookie deals. Usually it's a combination of these strategies.

TL/DR, your logic is dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is just my opinion. I wouldn't give up more than (3) 1st Round Picks, a mid round pick, and if your trading a player for Watson I'd rather it be Brian Burns or another player then CMC! Every time needs a great QB, but also needs a great RB to take some of the pressure off the QB!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, woahfraze said:

This is silly.

We'd be in the same situation with any franchise QB, not just Watson.  To win in the NFL, you have to have a franchise QB.  To have a franchise QB (unless they are on a rookie deal, in which case you're probably only getting a year or two of high level play before you have to pay them), you have to pony up the cap space to keep them on the roster.  And allocating that cap space to a franchise QB means having to make tough decisions about other players that also need to get payed. You can either pay all the top guys and skimp on depth, only keep the QB and try to spread around the remaining cap around a larger of mid-level guys, try to stagger and structure deals so that the cap hits vary year to year to fit it all in under the cap, or hope to draft well enough that you're constantly getting outsized contributions for your dollars from players on rookie deals. Usually it's a combination of these strategies.

TL/DR, your logic is dumb.

Actually your logic is not logical at all. You forgot the whole part about giving up multiple firsts when you will be needing them to replace the guys you admitted won't be resigned. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

Actually your logic is not logical at all. You forgot the whole part about giving up multiple firsts when you will be needing them to replace the guys you admitted won't be resigned. 

I wasn't speaking to what we would need to trade to get Watson. Simply pointing out that cap space arguments like that shouldn't be used to prevent us from making/exploring the trade.  Roster management must occur regardless of whether our QB is DeShaun Watson or in a couple years, a QB like a Zach Wilson that could also require a large contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, rippadonn said:

Clemson is "home". So it's pretty obvious that he's a fit here. You don't have to wonder if he wants to stay here, HOME.

DO IT!

This idea of "home" seems to keep popping up...

...he was actually born and raised in Gainesville, GA which is just NE of Atlanta and right on the way to  Clemson (82 miles from Gainesville).  As you'd expect he was a GA schoolboy football legend who set lots of state records and won a state championship in his junior season.

His time spent in Clemson amounted to only 3 years because he started as a true freshman.

Charlotte is 135 miles from Clemson and not on the way to or from anything Deshaun has ever been involved in or associated with...

..."home" is Georgia -- they too have an NFL team that would like to upgrade at the QB position.

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, woahfraze said:

I wasn't speaking to what we would need to trade to get Watson. Simply pointing out that cap space arguments like that shouldn't be used to prevent us from making/exploring the trade.  Roster management must occur regardless of whether our QB is DeShaun Watson or in a couple years, a QB like a Zach Wilson that could also require a large contract.

Although your tone was a little (maybe a lot) "extra", I think you're right. But really all that you had to say:

At some point, if you have a franchise level QB, you're going to have to maneuver your team-specific contractual landscape. That being the case, this shouldn't be an obstacle to acquiring the most talented QBs in the business!

 

At some point, if you're lucky, you're going to have to pay the piper! You're going to have to pay your guy, try and manipulate numbers to keep as many key players as possible, plan, and continue to make tough choices to try and keep the franchise in contention. These are things that the top franchises in the NFL do more times than not! It comes with the territory! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope we don't do something stupid like trading a couple of firsts and the best  RB in this franchise's history for an poor mans Cam Newton that we will have to pay a small fortune in salary to.  Fug that - teams win by drafting talent not trading the farm for it.

Edited by Paa Langfart
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Paa Langfart said:

I hope we don't do something stupid like trading a couple of firsts and the best  RB in this franchise's history for an poor mans Cam Newton that we will have to pay a small fortune in salary to.

In what world is Watson a poor mans Cam Newton? One where the rich are inaccurate and inconsistent? I love Cam but that statement is silly. 

Also it's "a poor" not "an poor" for your grammar lesson of the day. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

If we do or don't do a deal with Watson(looking increasingly unlikely if the reports of the Jets and Dolphins being his two preferred destinations are accurate) some hard decisions will have to be made on those guys.

Twitter is saying his interest in the Jets has been majorly inflated by the media so that helps a bit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Paa Langfart said:

I hope we don't do something stupid like trading a couple of firsts and the best  RB in this franchise's history for an poor mans Cam Newton that we will have to pay a small fortune in salary to.  Fug that - teams win by drafting talent not trading the farm for it.

I love Cam, but DeShaun Watson is a far better passer than Cam was. Your statement is just silly.  

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...