Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let's say you are Deshaun Watson, bias aside, where do you want to go?

davos

By davos,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Shocker said:

If he goes to Miami I am seriously making a run at Tua.  If we can get him for a few non-day 1 picks I think that is a steal.  I realize many question his season last year but I think he can be awesome given some time.  

Tua IMO has just as much upside as anyone in the draft outside of Trevor.

Or if they draft a QB at #2. 

I said earlier, Tua makes Moton the blind side protector.  A win win, if you ask me.  The circumstances, (surgery, covid, preseason--I would not give up on him, but if they do, yes.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
nctarheelreincarnated Newbie

nctarheelreincarnated

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

So you give someone poo for having a different opinion?  Pretty fugging arrogant.  I never said he would not help--but do you want another elite QB getting pounded because there is no LT, LG, or decent C?  Do you want to go another season without a MLB?  Watson does not tackle people or get them off the field on third down--

I'm not worried about the offensive line, and I'm good with Carter at MLB. He was better than that dip poo Whitehead. And no, I give you poo because of your consistent whining about us winning meaningless games for "culture." Offensive Line was makeshift anyway, and the Draft won't allow you to get a good LT. LG and Center you can find throughout the draft. Creed Hump is expected to be a late second rounder, and that guy is an absolute beast. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, nctarheelreincarnated said:

I'm not worried about the offensive line, and I'm good with Carter at MLB. He was better than that dip poo Whitehead. And no, I give you poo because of your consistent whining about us winning meaningless games for "culture." Offensive Line was makeshift anyway, and the Draft won't allow you to get a good LT. LG and Center you can find throughout the draft. Creed Hump is expected to be a late second rounder, and that guy is an absolute beast. 

You are not worried about the offensive line.  That alone disqualifies the rest of your posts.  Just going to block you because I prefer intelligent discourse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

All depends on what DW wants.

Super Bowls?  Fame?  Endorsements?  Small City Life?  Big City Life?

Don't know the man.

But were it me, I can tell you where I'd be heading.

Miami.

Then: LA, Carolina, San Fran.

You can extrapolate somewhat based on his dissatisfaction with Houston.

He's paid a boatload of money, but the team's not winning. That would make me think winning is at least something of a priority.

Clearly, ownership by non-morons would be nice too.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I think the big market thing is overplayed now. Cam was a huge name in Charlotte. Mahomes is the biggest name in the NFL in KC. It just doesn't matter that much anymore.

If I'm looking across the league, QB issues aside, city wise, I'd want:

NYC (Tribeca, Hudson, or in Manhattan, find a top notch penthouse, then a T-Swift Folklore type-cabin upstate)

Miami (Ocean front home, it's Miami, but I'm in Florida.  Mixed feelings)

LAR (Live near Rivers and Brees in North County SD, I hate LA proper minus a few spots like Highland Park/Silverlake.  Maybe get a spot in Malibu or down near Laguna/Dana Point)

Arizona (I'd get an estate outside of Flagstaff/San Fran Peaks and heli down to Phoenix, maybe grab a nice house outside of Phoenix as well for accessibility)

SF/SEA (Great cities, weather is hit/miss but they're great spots to live.  I'd get something a bit on the outskirts)

Chicago (I'd go for an amazing condo in West Loop and a brownstone in Gold Coast/Oldtown triangle, lakehouse in northern Wisconsin)

--

Charlotte is nice and all but I'd have no interest in living there.  Hell no to ATL.

I'm thinking SF & NYC are the top choices here.

Edited by davos
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
43 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I think the Rams could be players for Stafford but I don't think they have the cap space to absorb Watson while also dealing with Goff's cap blow.

The question was who should Watson want to play for, not whether or not those teams could make it work...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, davos said:

If I'm looking across the league, QB issues aside, city wise, I'd want:

NYC (Tribeca, Hudson, or in Manhattan, find a top notch penthouse, then a T-Swift Folklore type-cabin upstate)

Miami (Ocean front home, it's Miami, but I'm in Florida.  Mixed feelings)

LAR (Live near Rivers and Brees in North County SD, I hate LA proper minus a few spots like Highland Park/Silverlake.  Maybe get a spot in Malibu or down near Laguna/Dana Point)

Arizona (I'd get an estate outside of Flagstaff and heli down to Phoenix, maybe grab a nice house outside of Phoenix as well for accessibility)

SF/SEA (Great cities, weather is hit/miss but they're great spots to live.  I'd get something a bit on the outskirts)

Chicago (I'd go for an amazing condo in West Loop and a brownstone in Gold Coast/Old Park triangle, lakehouse in northern Wisconsin)

--

Charlotte is nice and all but I'd have no interest in living there.  Hell no to ATL.

I'm thinking SF & NYC are the top choices here.

I'm the opposite. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Shocker said:

You are probably right, I was thinking they (Texans) prefer to pick one at 3 but maybe not.

Getting back a Young quarterback may at least help them somewhat save face.

That said, no matter what they get back for him, trading away Watson is going to be a wildly unpopular move if it happens.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites
nctarheelreincarnated Newbie

nctarheelreincarnated

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

You are not worried about the offensive line.  That alone disqualifies the rest of your posts.  Just going to block you because I prefer intelligent discourse.

Because the O-Line wasn’t that bad. Get an LG or Center in the Draft or FA. And it’ll be fine. You posting at all disqualifies your opinion. Shrugs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...