Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hypothetically We Land Watson


Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

This is actually incorrect. His cap hit in 2021 is very low, $10.54 mil but his 2022 cap hit is $35 mil which would be the second highest paid year(after 2023) of his contract. These figures are assuming he is traded, they are substantially higher for the Texans with his prorated bonus money added.

Yeah, they still have 2020 figures on OTC, by the time I realized I couldn't edit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LT - draft in the 2nd round. Eichenburg, Radunz, Mayfield may be options. 

LG - sign Joe Thuney. 

C - Paradis (one last year)

RG - draft Humphrey, Meyers, or Dickerson in the 3rd round. Play here for a year, move to center in 2022. Draft a RG in 2022

RT - resign Moton

 

You have 2 rookies starting, but have experienced guys playing next to them. 

Edited by TheProcess
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've mentioned it before but I'd like to somehow keep 2023s 1st rounder.  I'd rather stretch things out and add players, but it could make our offer less valuable than Miami, NYJ or elsewhere who both have Tua and Darnold respectively.  I also think we try to package HOU's 2nd rounder in 2022 which will basically be a first. Or maybe their 2022 3rd.  That way, we retain (3) top-80 picks next year.  The hit won't be as hard 

My ideal package would be:

2021 1st (#8)

2022 1st

2023 3rd

2024 1st

Shaq Thompson

Teddy Bridgewater

(hell, maybe toss in Donte Jackson)

for

Deshaun Watson

HOU 2022 2nd/3rd

--

So then next year, we either have (2)2nds+3rd or 2nd+(2)3rds in lieu of a 1st, 2nd, & 3rd. 

We don't lose any crazy talent & I could see Shaq being valuable to Houston.  Houston may try for a better player but we can't have Chinn & Burns in discussion IMO.  As much as I hate it, WRs are producing all over so I don't think we can or should have DJ off limits 😕

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Anthony Hill Jr or give me death
    • We need a Sam Off Ball Backer to pair with Lloyd. Lloyd is a strong Interior Will especially in Pass Coverage- but that is also Trevin Wallace’s archetype. Need a Rozeboom style run stopper. Rodriguez and Allen fit that
    • There aren’t that many ways to screw Day 2 up.  That’d be them making an obvious reach, or selecting at one of the few positions that we are pretty solid at. Because as excited as we are for the growth and improvement this team is showing, it’s still not an overly talented or deep roster. Honestly, there aren’t really many positions I’d feel bad about. Feelings about Bryce aside (because we are not going to select a QB), it’s really RB (bad positional value) and that’s it. I guess OT too since we grabbed Freeling in Round 1.    While not as high on my wish list as other spots, you can justify WR or TE.     Interior offensive lineman who would likely take over an interior spot either this year (at center) or guard (next for cap casualty of Hunt or Lewis)? Fine by me.   Dlineman? Yes, that’s a highly rotational position and we have zero quality depth.    ILB? Yep, could stand for an upgrade over Wallace.    EDGE? Absolutely wouldn’t hate another option to spell Phillips, Scourton, and Princely.    FS?  Would love to add better coverage skill set to the backend of the defense. Moehrig and Ransom are great in run support but not as good deep. Adding a more traditional FS would allow us to mix and match/run some 3 safety sub packages and or a big nickel type look with a SS down near the line for better run support in possible pass downs.    CB? Could stand to get better at nickel. 
×
×
  • Create New...