Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mitchell Trubisky.. please no


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

After seeing how the huddle reacted with Haskins, I’m sure things will be blown out of proportion here too


to be fair, trubisky actually had a decent year and won football games. 

Not to mention his head is on a little straighter than the aforementioned.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Shocker said:

I don't hate Mitch to be honest especially if he is super cheap.  

He costs no picks and shouldn’t break the bank.  We can always make a run a QB next draft too.  I don't hate it.

I agree with this. If we could get him on a cheap 1 year deal, how is he not an upgrade over the guys we have now? At worst, he is an instant upgrade for our #2 QB.

Edited by kungfoodude
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

After seeing how the huddle reacted with Haskins, I’m sure things will be blown out of proportion here too


to be fair, trubisky actually had a decent year and won football games. 

Well so far Rhule brought in Teddy, then was interested in Haskins....not a great track record so far. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have a new GM that just said we’ll be a part of every deal, so this isn’t the least bit surprising. He’d make a decent backup, so why not hear out offers.

I like that we’re going to be more involved throughout the league. It means we’re starting conversations and making new connections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...