Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marcus Mariotta?

raleigh-panther

By raleigh-panther,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

raleigh-panther Grand Master

raleigh-panther

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Beerfacedlegend said:

We already made one back up our starter why would we get him? Think


 

you think

Remind you that Tannehill was a starter. Then Backup. Then started for the Titans 

everyone tries to draft or trade for the next Brady or Mahomes. 

sometimes, that isnt possible and for a team that is basically getting four maybe five new Olinemen, or needs to, mariota mightn't be a bad stop gap 

Edited by raleigh-panther
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Catsfan69 Grand Master

Catsfan69

Posted
Posted (edited)

What you guys in The Draft Sewell/Address Other Needs Crew fail to understand is this.

 

If we address other needs we will start winning 7 to 10 games a year and will never be able to cheaply ( FA or trading firsts to move up) get a QB.

 

People are so short sighted. This was the year to suck. One year rip the band aid off and move on.

But no Rhules phucking ego clouds his vision. He thinks it's college and he can build a program and recruit a stud QB.

 

Well when you do that in the NFL you have to mortgage the future with losing draft picks or salary cap or both.

Edited by Catsfan69
  • Poo 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
raleigh-panther Grand Master

raleigh-panther

Posted
  • Author
Posted
12 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

What you guys in The Draft Sewell/Address Other Needs Crew fail to understand is this.

 

If we address other needs we will start winning 7 to 10 games a year and will never be able to cheaply ( FA or trading firsts to move up) get a QB.

 

People are so short sighted. This was the year to suck. One year rip the band aid off and move on.

But no Rhules phucking ego clouds his vision. He thinks it's college and he can build a program and recruit a stud QB.

 

Well when you do that in the NFL you have to mortgage the future with losing draft picks or salary cap or both.

 Im  not short sighted at all

i would prefer they draft a QB 

unfortunately, that little ‘culture building’ win combined with several other teams with QB needs with a lot more to offer and the Panthers failure to address the oline has changed the dynamic

I Would prefer they stay at 8 and if the guy they want is there, take him 

the  Panthers brain  trusts have also run their mouths so much that they are going to be viewed as desperate and that only lessens their bargaining ability 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2021/02/09/panthers-most-veteran-qb-trade-talks/?fbclid=IwAR3qbf_uSTNAFdGRO3HWU51AF-N6TfrN3C4O3vdxlu435k6ulon3sqFvo7k
 

Why not. Young. Mobile. Firmer number one.  Wouldn’t be as expensive 

could buy time as the Panthers address all the other needs. 
 

 

I thought we wanted someone who could pass better than Teddy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sgt Schultz Grand Master

Sgt Schultz

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

He played pretty well in LV, but if the Raiders thought they had something there, they would be trading Carr now.  I do not see it.

I think they are shopping Carr.

The problem is that is a loaded statement on my part.  The coach is Jon Gruden.  He has wanted to trade Carr since day one.  If Mariota becomes the starting QB, then he will want to trade Mariota.  If Mahomes were to wind up in Las Vegas after Mariota, he would want to trade Mahomes.  The man has never met a QB he didn't want to unload.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...