Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Restructure contacts to free up more cap. Bridgewater, Shaq, etc.


razorwolf
 Share

Recommended Posts

IMO If the team ends up keeping Bridgewater which could be a little handy when bringing in a rookie QB, and also keep Shaq for at least another year. You could restructure both of there 2021 contacts to free up cap savings!

*Bridgewater estimated cap savings: $8.1M

*Shaq estimated cap savings: $6.3M

*Total cap savings for these 2 players in 2021: Around $14,414,167 if restructured

*Figures based off overthecap.com

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pup McBarky said:

how bout no GIF

I know where your coming from on your gif image. I'm just saying the team has options to free up more cap savings if (Fitt, Rhule, and Tepper decides to try that option) on these players. But restructuring Shaq contract would save more cap space than if you released or traded him pre-June 1st (cap savings $4,580,000; dead money: $9,600,000). If released or traded post-June 1st would have cap savings of $4,563,333 (cap savings:$10,980,000; dead money:3,200,000) more than restructuring his contract (cap savings:6,326,667; dead money: $0). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, razorwolf said:

I know where your coming from on your gif image. I'm just saying the team has options to free up more cap savings if (Fitt, Rhule, and Tepper decides to try that option) on these players. But restructuring Shaq contract would save more cap space than if you released or traded him pre-June 1st (cap savings $4,580,000; dead money: $9,600,000). If released or traded post-June 1st would have cap savings of $4,563,333 (cap savings:$10,980,000; dead money:3,200,000) more than restructuring his contract (cap savings:6,326,667; dead money: $0). 

TB and Shaq are both overpaid. Restructuring doesn't rectify this. We pay them this year and cut them both next year. We draft their replacements this year or next. That is the best financial and football decision on each of them.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't think Teddy would be willing to restructure. Unsure about Shaq. 

Teddy will most likely be gone this offseason and I suspect Shaq will be gone after 2021. 

Our best hope from an overall view is to trade teddy for a second or third round after June first to a team in dire need of a QB, such as one who losses their starting QB in training camp. Anything else and he's a flat loss books wise.

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It will be really interesting to see how both sides handle this. I'm sure the team would love to get him signed to a 4 year deal based on his output so far and some potential factored in, i.e. something like a 4 year $30 million contract.  But I could see his agent telling him the best path is to take the one year offer, put up a big year next year and then really cash in. The team also has to keep in mind T-Mac's 2nd contract, which likely will happen after the 2027 season assuming he keeps improving as expected.  Even if we could get him on a budget 4 year deal for what he could become, the problem then becomes when he wants to re-negotiate in 2 years during the same summer we will extend T-Mac, and you don't want to spend that much on WRs in one offseason, just see the Bengals this last year. Taking everything into consideration, I'm thinking the 1 year deal and then getting him to sign a 4-5 year deal after hopefully say a 800ish yard season next year might be best for our cap situation and separate his and T-Mac's negotiation periods.
    • And yet jax made it no further than we did, and its very possible the Pats don't either. I think it speaks more to the overall down year for the nfl as far as having great/dominant teams, every team this year has fatal flaws that can be exploited 
    • Ehhh I agree the nfc is stronger this year but their really werent any truly dominant teams this year everyone is flawed, I think the narrative for the NFL this year will to try ahd force a Josh Allen SB win
×
×
  • Create New...