Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers will "pay any price" for Watson (via Sportsnaut via PFN)


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, HardcoreHokie said:

Three firsts, Derrick Brown, Donte Jackson, Teddy Bridgewater.  Does that get it done?  
 

Draft a QB at #8 and TB is your bridge this year.  Two second year stars on defense (but not BB/JC).  I feel like that’s our starting point. 

McCaffrey, DJ Moore, Brian Burns, our next 3 1st round picks, 2022 2nd round pick, 2023 3rd round pick 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

No it will not 

Agreed.  Miami has two 1st’s and two 2nd’s *this year* plus Tua and plenty of young defensive studs.

If Miami is bidding against us...Brian Burns and/or Jeremy Chinn will have to be included.

And I doubt a $64 million RB is high on Houston’s list. Just saying.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

McCaffrey, DJ Moore, Brian Burns, our next 3 1st round picks, 2022 2nd round pick, 2023 3rd round pick 

I’d dangle CMC and Moore all day, but the rookie deals is what they’re going to value the most.  That’s what makes Burns, Brown, and Chinn so valuable.  Everyone loves CMC but I doubt a rebuilding franchise values a $64million running back that high.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Derrick Brown was the main reason our run defense was not terrible last year.  2019 was so frustrating Luke retired. I don’t want to see Watson on the sidelines watching teams slowly run down the field and control the clock. With YGM showing promise and Haynes developing, we honestly might be better off trading Burns instead of Brown. Burns will hold more value and probably be due a larger salary sooner....

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...