Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Marino The draft network QB scoring and write ups

raleigh-panther

By raleigh-panther,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

jfra78 Veteran

jfra78

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

His scale is either wrong or he's grading WAY too hard.  According to his scale Wilson and Fields are not top 10 picks and Trey Lance is a 2nd rounder.  WRONG.

No its completely right, everyone is just blinded by the need for QB.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jfra78 Veteran

jfra78

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Supply and demand. 5 QBs considered to be 1st round this year because there are a dozen teams needing one. In a typical year there's probably only 2 or 3 going in round 1. 

So why waste a top ten pick on a should be 2nd rounder

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Verge Veteran

Verge

Posted
Posted
56 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

No its completely right, everyone is just blinded by the need for QB.  

Wilson is just as good as Kyler Murray coming out. Zach Wilson is a top 5 player in this draft. It is ridiculous to come to any other conclusion IMO 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BrianS Veteran

BrianS

Posted
Posted

The NFL brought this problem on themselves.  They've continued to emphasis offense over defense, and every offense starts with the QB.  It was much easier in the past to compete with an "average" QB, but you now need a "good" QB just to compete week in week out.  The college game isn't preparing it's QB's for the NFL properly because of all the vastly simplified one read systems.

One day we'll see a shift, I hope.  I'd like to see teams at least have a chance without that super high level QB, mostly because there are so few of them.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bababoey Enthusiast

bababoey

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, BrianS said:

The NFL brought this problem on themselves.  They've continued to emphasis offense over defense, and every offense starts with the QB.  It was much easier in the past to compete with an "average" QB, but you now need a "good" QB just to compete week in week out.  The college game isn't preparing it's QB's for the NFL properly because of all the vastly simplified one read systems.

One day we'll see a shift, I hope.  I'd like to see teams at least have a chance without that super high level QB, mostly because there are so few of them.

 

I would love for there to be a shift back to more defense and running game but with the TV ratings the way they are for the NFL, don't expect it any time soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, 45catfan said:

His scale is either wrong or he's grading WAY too hard.  According to his scale Wilson and Fields are not top 10 picks and Trey Lance is a 2nd rounder.  WRONG.

It’s because of the risk/reward IMO. He has the potential to be the best of the group, but could also struggle against better competition. Because if the importance of the position I think he is worth a first round pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      Bryce Young #34 on Chris Simms' top 40 list

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Oh it's nothing elite, but we played without Horn last year.  Gilly playing at 80% is better than any CB2 we have had in a moment.  Luvu was fun, but he was out of position in Evero's defense.  Jewell is a tackling machine and has had over 100 in 3 of his last 4 with his highest being at Denver with Evero.  Pass Rushing and CBs are strong red flags but they also were last year.  On paper it's the same or maybe slightly better than last year and Evero had them keeping us in some games.  Hell our 2 wins were due to the defense and the kicking game.
    • mrcompletely11
      Bryce Young #34 on Chris Simms' top 40 list

      By mrcompletely11 · Posted

      I mean best case scenario is horn plays 15ish games, brown and clowney replicate last years stats, we sign gilmore and he reverts back to form after his injury but even then we still lack pass rush and our linebackers are dogshit.  And thats best case.  If horn goes down and if clowney starts showing his age then it could get ugly.  We are going to miss the tenacity of luvu.
    • ForJimmy
      Bryce Young #34 on Chris Simms' top 40 list

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Well you have year 2 of the new scheme so several players should be more comfortable.   Vs last year DL we added Robinson to play DE giving Brown a solid presence on the other side, plus he is familiar with Evero (I don't like Shy at NT but he was there last year too)  LB- Clowney and Wonnum are more complete/probably better than Burns and YGM, Jewell and Shaq are better than Luvu and whatever random guy from the streets we had playing last and again Jewell is familiar with Evero CB- This is a big red flag but vs last year we kept Hill at slot, we lost Henderson and replaced him with Jackson which seems like a wash to me.  If we can sign Gilly I will consider this upgraded but as of now it's a weakness and a wash Safety- Fuller replaces Bell as an upgrade who is also familiar with Evero.  I think we signed another vet in Scott as depth   Depth is still an issue no doubt but it looks slightly better on paper than last year IMO...
×
×
  • Create New...