Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC and Shaq restructured

NAS

By NAS,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
Just now, Mr. Scot said:

If you watched closely, there was a point just after this came up where Rhule got a look in his eyes that said "Sh-t, I wasn't supposed to mention that, was I?" 😆

Definitely interesting that this was unintentionally leaked mere hours after releasing a "we won't be doing poo in FA" article via the team website. Kinda seems like we were sandbagging publicly while preparing ourselves to have the space to potentially make some moves if the opportunity presented itself.

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OneBadCat Grand Master

OneBadCat

Posted
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's a critical error to restructure Shaq. Restructuring a player who should be being released is peak Hurney. It's as if he never left.

Not saying you're wrong. But he's decent enough to create another hole we have to fill should we cut him.

Edited by OneBadCat
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Cap space. And he wouldn't be released until after this season. He is WAY overpaid for what he is.

We can cut him next year and save 13million toward the cap and only cost us 3.2 mil in dead cap according to the deal restructure. 

  • Pie 11
  • Beer 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Definitely interesting that this was unintentionally leaked mere hours after releasing a "we won't be doing poo in FA" article via the team website. Kinda seems like we were sandbagging publicly while preparing ourselves to have the space to potentially make some moves if the opportunity presented itself.

We still might get not, but either way it's funny as hell 😆

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • KillerKat
      New site coming sooner than planned??

      By KillerKat · Posted

      That new home page looking sexy and thicc
    • The Third Reich
      Ikem

      By The Third Reich · Posted

      Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
    • UnluckyforSome
      Sorsby to the supplemental draft

      By UnluckyforSome · Posted

      Supplemental draft uses picks from next year. So a team were to draft him in the 1st, their upcoming 1st next draft would no longer be available. There have been some notable players that were obtained in the supplemental draft, such as Kosar. It doesn't necessarily happen every year either, and is more on a as needed basis. The gambling trouble is a big red flag for teams, and maybe pushes him down to a 4th? Not sure a team would use a 1st on him.
×
×
  • Create New...