Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interior DL


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I think it's more of taking a mulligan on whatever they tried last year.  It's probably more like a full reboot like they should have done last year.

Well, if we are looking at rebuilding Part Deux, I guess we can count on another top 10 draft pick again. Oh well........I did originally say I thought it would be 4-6 years before we would be contenders again. Looks like that could end up being right. 

Guess we will see what "the plan" is for the rest of the offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

The timing is odd for that, I smell a big deal being announced soon.

I gotta be honest, if we nuked all our depth(which was already bad) to make a "big signing"...........it's going to be a long "X" amount of years until our next coaching staff, GM and/or owner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Did he list himself as being a Panther before though?

There's nothing Panthers related on his account and he only lists himself as an "NFL linebacker".

Not according to the wayback machine. Was the same text back in 24th of january. So "NFL linebacker" is not new.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Well, if we are looking at rebuilding Part Deux, I guess we can count on another top 10 draft pick again. Oh well........I did originally say I thought it would be 4-6 years before we would be contenders again. Looks like that could end up being right. 

Guess we will see what "the plan" is for the rest of the offseason.

It was always a 3 year at best build no matter what everyone said.  We are kinda in year 2 but we've had some setbacks.  So basically they are no closer to solving most of their problems, especially the QB.  It is hard for me to believe they every saw Teddy as more than a bridge until they find whatever it is they are looking for in the position.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Could be a false alarm on my part then.

With that said, I'm still not sure I see him as the week one starter.

Well, looking at today cuts it seems everything is on the table. Would save 920k on against the cap if the numbers I saw is correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm arguing that should those supposed deficiencies, like height or pocket footwork, be as consequential as you and others have claimed, then there would be a clear, observable impact in the data. That's not unreasonable. For example, batted passes are often used as a size-related concern (see: Baker Mayfield), yet Bryce ranked among the lowest in deflections at the line. If his stature is such a limitation, why isn't it showing up there? Or are you suggesting that's why his passing yards fall short of your expectations? If the latter, I would hope that you're not discounting yards left on the field due to drops (of which he led the league in).  Also, asking for specific, measurable benchmarks isn't aggression... it's accountability. If that feels uncomfortable, it might be worth reflecting on how much of your anti-Bryce argument is grounded in subjective perception rather than objective metrics. So, again: do you have any specific KPIs beyond total passing yardage, height, and weight that you consider relevant to evaluating whether a QB is top-10? If you want to add YPA and passing yards per game to those metrics, that's fair, just be clear about it. But let's not pretend that asking for clarity is some kind of provocation. I'm simply trying to understand the actual criteria... not just the vibes.
    • Jackson actually played quite well for a #2 CB #54 in PFF coverage ratings 12 pass break ups solid in run defense..... Hes gonna be targeted just because Jacyee IS being avoided.
    • Yeah, these arguments are getting twisted to the point that it's just an airing of old grievances for the 100th time. No matter what happened in the past, no matter what the "trajectory" is, Bryce has to show why he was a number 1 overall draft pick.  If people didn't like Cam and what he did for us at QB, I hate to see what poor Bryce is gonna get if he doesn't reach Manning-esque heights. 
×
×
  • Create New...