Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It's happening. (Probably)


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, hepcat said:

It’s obviously all concocted by the Texans ownership retaliating for his trade demand.

You can't possibly believe this.

It would be impossible execute such a ruse without getting caught...

...you should be embarrassed for even suggesting as such.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh!! I am not too excited anymore!! If it cost what’s being projected!! If we lose Brown, Burns or Chinn I will be pissed!! Defense wins!! Screw that!! I say trade up for Fields or Wilson!! If they want to gamble 

Edited by DamnItJake!
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, joemac said:

So trading one draft worth’s of picks in NOT worth landing maybe the second best QB in the world? 

Pain is temporary- Super Bowls are forever. We’re never going anywhere unless we get a top flight signal caller and excuse me if I don’t think the number 4 or 5 QB in this year draft is the bees knees.

Just faaar too much for me, I love having a young defensive trading it away or in no rush to trade alllllll that for any one player including Lance/Lawrence. 

You got a grasp on the panthers, we just had Cam and well.....are you at least going to agree we didnt protect him well enough? Have you seen the current OL, no matter the rainbow positive feelings nor luck would I put a elite QB behind it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if i had a gun to my head and had to guess what was going on, id say that this is a POS front office/ownership trying to fug over a player on his way out. 

 

When in reality its just driving his price down..    doesn't logically make sense for them to do that..  which is why i think the texans, or actually the friends of that POS owner, are doing this. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Classic honeypot. The timing says everything, had this come out weeks ago it would have an ounce of believability. 

Why isn't this kind of stuff looked at as an extortion plot and investigated as such, instead of media and public guilt until proven innocent?

In my opinion it looks like a hater with inside knowledge of the business dealings trying to throw a dirty sleezy monkey wrench into Watson departure. I'm sure he can't wait to get away from such foolishness.

Edited by rippadonn
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:
Because all cases are exactly the same, "Whatabout?" is a great argument.
 

I'm not suggesting Whiny Watson is guilty of anything...

...but the Huddle Court of Opinion certainly is giving him a complete pass vs. any other player (or executive) in recent times who has been accused of anything remotely close to this!

Hmm, I wonder why....??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s kind of overrated to be honest. Never really felt like a true #1 or elevated his play to become a guy the defense really has to worry about. 
    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
×
×
  • Create New...