Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deshaun Allegations detailed (not good)


Mills
 Share

Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, Peppers90 NC said:

This is what happens when player has more power than owner. Billionaire won’t accept it. Watson appears to be a stand up guy. We know Easterby and Cal are dirty scoundrels. Timing is too coincidental, they want to sink him.

I still don't understand this argument one bit, it literally makes zero sense for the Texans ownership/leadership to be behind it whether true or not.

In what way would this benefit McNair?

If true, it would get his QB suspended or worse

If false, it destroys his trade value for a while and likely hurts it regardless.

They'd have been better off keeping it quiet, trading him for a ransom, and then letting all this go public a few days later and let the other team deal with it while you reap the rewards from the trade.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

I still don't understand this argument one bit, it literally makes zero sense for the Texans ownership/leadership to be behind it whether true or not.

In what way would this benefit McNair?

If true, it would get his QB suspended or worse

If false, it destroys his trade value for a while and likely hurts it regardless.

They'd have been better off keeping it quiet, trading him for a ransom, and then letting all this go public a few days later and let the other team deal with it while you reap the rewards from the trade.

Does anybody understand what Houston is doing the last couple of years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tukafan21 said:

I still don't understand this argument one bit, it literally makes zero sense for the Texans ownership/leadership to be behind it whether true or not.

In what way would this benefit McNair?

If true, it would get his QB suspended or worse

If false, it destroys his trade value for a while and likely hurts it regardless.

They'd have been better off keeping it quiet, trading him for a ransom, and then letting all this go public a few days later and let the other team deal with it while you reap the rewards from the trade.

This is a power situation it’s not about winning for the McNair’s. Ego is a real thing.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

I still don't understand this argument one bit, it literally makes zero sense for the Texans ownership/leadership to be behind it whether true or not.

In what way would this benefit McNair?

If true, it would get his QB suspended or worse

If false, it destroys his trade value for a while and likely hurts it regardless.

They'd have been better off keeping it quiet, trading him for a ransom, and then letting all this go public a few days later and let the other team deal with it while you reap the rewards from the trade.

People keep talking about this "not making sense" for the Texans?

What moves have they been making over the last two years or so that HAVE made sense? They get no credit for firing O'Brien after letting him absolutely tank the roster after promoting him to HC/GM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Scott12345 said:

After all the JR stuff, there is no way Tepper can bring this guy here

there would be protests in front of the stadium every day

and the local press would harass Tepper to no end

it’s over 

He could, but would be a huge hypocrite as he scrubbed the organization of everything JR as some sort of moral virtue signaling to the community as the new owner.  I guess billionaires can be complete hypocrites though, right?  He can employ womanizers (putting it mildly) as long he, himself, isn't one.  There's the fine print.

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

People keep talking about this "not making sense" for the Texans?

What moves have they been making over the last two years or so that HAVE made sense? They get no credit for firing O'Brien after letting him absolutely tank the roster after promoting him to HC/GM.

& moreover the Texans fired O'Brien after only 4 games into the  2020 season.

another hasty move or better yet let's say reaction

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

He could, but would be a huge hypocrite as he scrubbed the organization of everything JR as some sort of moral virtue signaling to the community as the new owner.  I guess billionaires can be complete hypocrites though, right?  He can employ womanizers (putting it mildly) as long he, himself, isn't one.  There's the fine print.

please let me make sure I completely understand what you are saying...?

& that is DeShaun Watson is a womanizer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

Feels like a publicity grab. Almost like someone intentionally wanted this lawyer to get his hands on it bc they knew how flamboyant he would be about it.

We’re talking about rape and sexual assault here. This is very fuging serious and this lawyer is doing a Facebook press conference? This is so fuging weird. Not to mention he drunk posts this story on IG at 11 pm at night and talks poo to people commenting that he’s a former marine. The whole thing is a giant mess.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, bandu said:

please let me make sure I completely understand what you are saying...?

& that is DeShaun Watson is a womanizer?

I guess 'alleged' at this point, but if true, calling him a womanizer is putting it mild.  You do know the allegations...especially the one the came out today?  If true, then Tepper would be 100% hypocritical to even think about signing Watson here, civil suit or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
    • Last year Thielen had 615 yards in 10 games (had more ypg than his 1k season in 23).  XL had 497 in 16 games with tons of drops and Coker had 478 in 11. They also only had only 192 of our 518 targets to get those numbers. So if Thielen has 1,000 yards again, XL and Coker each improve to say 600 yards each, and T-Mac comes in at 800 yards, you're going to say that's not good enough?  Especially if he ends up with close to, if not getting to, double digit TD's like I think he will, as he's going to be a red zone monster for Bryce? Because if that's the breakdown of just the Top 4 and Bryce plays all 17 games, he's going to be pushing a 4,000 yard season as the TEs, RBs, and other WRs will probably add up to 750-1k yards as well, and I think that would be far more than anyone here could be expecting of him this season. Last year the Giants only had 2 players with more than 331 yards besides Nabers and they were 699 and 573 while Nabers "only" had 1,200 yards (granted in 15 games).  While the Jags second leading receiving was a TE with 411 yards and BTJ also "only" had 1,282 but in all 17 games. If everyone stays healthy and XL/Coker have improved, I think Bryce is going to spread the ball around rather than focus on T-Mac in a way that most of the 1k rookies have been able to get. Again I point to MHJ and the Cardinals last year. They had 3,859 yards receiving.   McBride had 1,146, MHJ had 885, then their 3rd and 4th in rec yards were 548 and 414. Take the 146 and 85 that McBride/MHJ had over my example for our guys and give them to the other two and they get to 7 yards shy of the 600 I'm using for XL/Coker, while the rest of the team added up to 866 yards. So, if you expect T-Mac to get to 1k, where are you taking those yards from? if anything, XL and Coker each getting 600 yards seems like a low projection, so they wouldn't come from there. Maybe they come from Thielen now that we have T-Mac as the true #1.  But I think if anything, having T-Mac draw attention will just make it easier for Thielen to get open and him and Bryce have great chemistry already, he's not going to stop throwing his way if he can pick up easy chunks of yards there. So maybe they come from the RBs, TEs, other WRs, but it's I think a very fair example to show why expecting 1,000 yards if everyone stays healthy isn't necessarily fair to him. It's also why I said I'd then expect at least 1,200 yards in 2026, as once Thielen leave and all 3 of T-Mac/XL/Coker get better, they absorb that 1,000 yards Thielen leaves behind with T-Mac probably taking close to half of it and the other two splitting up the other half.
×
×
  • Create New...