Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deshaun Allegations detailed (not good)


Mills
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, AceBoogie said:

It takes a civil case and makes it criminal I can tell you that. 

I have a hard time believing that any woman that is afraid of a large man sexually assaulting them is going to take the time to think about whether or not it'll be a civil case or a criminal case when they're done. 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Bronn said:

How do you know he didn't ask for glute work and then accidentally fart in her face when she was doing the requested work?

What you're taking out of the context says more about you than it does Deshaun Watson.

Come on man lol...how many people do you know accidentally let one loose and later say something like sorry for making you feel uncomfortable.

Most people don’t even say anything and at most, in the moment say sorry about that or excuse me.

Edited by onmyown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kuhndog94 said:

I have a hard time believing that any woman that is afraid of a large man sexually assaulting them is going to take the time to think about whether or not it'll be a civil case or a criminal case when they're done. 

 

He philosophy is that as long as you don't stick your pecker in an orifice it's okay to harass a woman for sexual favors.  If you're not doing it you are a beta, I think that was his word.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kuhndog94 said:

I have a hard time believing that any woman that is afraid of a large man sexually assaulting them is going to take the time to think about whether or not it'll be a civil case or a criminal case when they're done. 

 

I have a hard time believing women are out here giving blowjobs to famous quarterbacks by “coercion” and filing civil but not criminal charges. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

None of them need money. We’re good. 

Only people who need money use poor judgment, put themselves in bad situations and wind up in trouble? 🤔

(there's a guy named Watson who I'd say serves as evidence to the contrary)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Only people who need money use poor judgment, put themselves in bad situations and wind up in trouble? 🤔

(there's a guy named Watson who I'd say serves as evidence to the contrary)

If you blow someone because they tell you it could make or break your career then yea you probably want the money or clout. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AceBoogie said:

I have a hard time believing women are out here giving blowjobs to famous quarterbacks by “coercion” and filing civil but not criminal charges. 

Dude... women don't automatically want to suck someone's dick because they're famous. 

Why do you think all of these players have to find escorts in the first place? 

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am trying to remember when I EVER said reach for need. My thing if someone falls you jump, if you can trade back a few slots and get help at the right value and pick up some ammo to move up from 51 which I think is outside the money zone, then you do that.   Take a WR later. Plenty of capable WRs have come from the 3rd round. Though this year I would go for C there if there was a reasonable choice. Take a TE if you must. I see more reason to take WR than TE. I think you give guys drafted two years ago and last year a chance to develop before cancelling them.    I think it is kind of unrealistic to throw everything all in on offense in hopes of going deep in the playoffs after an 8-10 year, even if it did have some nice bright spots in it.    And outside of this argument but relevant to it, I am bothered by Canales and Morgan and their apparent posture that we have arrived and are now in the big boy club. I don’t know where that comes from. They are out there talking like they are winners at 8-10. Backing into the playoffs in a real convoluted tie breaker scenario. They had some good games, yes. But the big feather n the cap, the LA Rams matchups, did you see what the Rams did? They didn’t fire the coaches but they fired their defensive backs. Bryce beat them yes, and it was pretty, but it was kind of like the Bucs and Mike Evans picking on our decimated secondary in 2022. Someone (Wilks) went down for allowing that to happen and they went down in LA too.  Wr aren’t as good as a whole lot of homers think we are. Shore up the trenches.    I think too many fans buy into it because they are so starved for anything that looks like a winner. 
    • How exactly does one win OROY "by default"? Wouldn't winning the award mean that of the two, McMillon stayed strong the entire year while the other guy didn't and fizzled out? That's like saying Secretariat only won by default because the other horse stopped moving midway through the race. Absolutely zero logic in that statement, which makes me very glad that I've never really paid much attention to Walterfoozball.
    • I agree, teams in the past have fired the HC in order to retain a coach on staff...hell it happened to Mcderp this year, rams in the past and Im missing another.  The fall off for the Panthers team defense was huge once Mcderp leftd and Ron could not fix it even when he named himself DC. 
×
×
  • Create New...