Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

49ers trading up to number 3 with Miami!


joemac
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, SOJA said:

FWIW Bill Voth basically said today on twitter the Panthers weren't considering trading up into the top 4 

There is hope after all, Lance is still in play...... if the insane rumors are truth about Mac Jones to SF. Beagual will have to be in play, since Dolphins traded back to 6th. I doubt anyone else trade for the top 7 picks, only the beaguals is in play it seems. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Basbear said:

There is hope after all, Lance is still in play...... if the insane rumors are truth about Mac Jones to SF. Beagual will have to be in play, since Dolphins traded back to 6th. I doubt anyone else trade for the top 7 picks, only the beaguals is in play it seems. 

I think we could end up with Fields at 8 and I'm not kidding

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SOJA said:

I think we could end up with Fields at 8 and I'm not kidding

Im about 90% sure Fields is ATLs target, so I seriously doubt he last that long. 

Right now the draft is playing out like this-

1. sunshine

2. wilson

3.    ...........................by some miracle Jones

4. Fields

5. Sewell

6.  Chase

7. ???

 

Edited by Basbear
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Im about 90% sure Fields is ATLs target, so I seriously doubt he last that long. 

Right now the draft is playing out like this-

1. sunshine

2. wilson

3.    ...........................by some miracle Jones

4. Fields

5. Sewell

6.  Chase

7. ???

 

Ben Allbright thinks they love lance

we have to pray SF takes Mac Jones and ATL takes Lance 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SOJA said:

Ben Allbright thinks they love lance

we have to pray SF takes Mac Jones and ATL takes Lance 

Im team lance, soooo I pray Mac=49(i just can not buy this, not now) Fields = ATL gets the hometown kid. btw its stilll farrrr too much for lance if that ends up being the pick. 

 

now think about the it.  Beaguals may not drafted Sewell, they signed Riley Reiff....hmmmmm They already drafted Jonah Williams. Im back to not knowing where they will go... Miami feels like a lock to draft a WR and Chase is the best one. 

Edited by Basbear
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright DW not just because I'm a Clemson fan but please don't be that sexual predator this franchise can't even lose right and is in love with getting out done by the likes of LOL Rivera and ofc Peyton.

But lets take a moment to clap and chew bubblegum. I'm bout to go rewatch that WTF game and be like yay a dub.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good news is we are going to get an elite player at 8 to waste right along side Cam, Luke, Olsen, Kalil, Gross, TD, Chinn, etc. All would be HoFers or potential HoFers with a competent GM/HC.

Ya know the type. the ones who don't call 7 step drops in the SB non stop until you've lost and that's literally the reason you lost. or run away top LTs and make them retire b/c they were ahead of the "you're a scumbag" train

Edited by Fox007
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OldhamA said:

I disagree - the best I've seen that system run was when the Broncos had Jake Plummer - a mobile QB.

You have to have a mobile QB in that system to account for the athletic zone blocking Olinemen not holding up against the pass. 

I don't disagree, but Kyle Shannahan certainly seems to given the QBs he has been connected to and drafted lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OldhamA said:

I disagree - the best I've seen that system run was when the Broncos had Jake Plummer - a mobile QB.

You have to have a mobile QB in that system to account for the athletic zone blocking Olinemen not holding up against the pass. 

So Jake Plummer over an MVP and what should’ve been a SB victory with Matt Ryan. Or if we’re counting his Dad’s teams, Steve Young 92-94 was his resume builder and got him the DEN job and b2b SBs with Elway. 
 

All very different type QBs and still managed to get the best out of all them. I can’t roll with the “Snake” Jr. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Toomers said:

So Jake Plummer over an MVP and what should’ve been a SB victory with Matt Ryan. Or if we’re counting his Dad’s teams, Steve Young 92-94 was his resume builder and got him the DEN job and b2b SBs with Elway. 
 

All very different type QBs and still managed to get the best out of all them. I can’t roll with the “Snake” Jr. 

Elway and Young were before my time.

As I understand it though they're both mobile QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • He just had his 5th year option picked up, I think we are still digging the hole. As far as DJ Moore, fools. How many picks did we waste chasing a replacement? I count a second and two firsts being what that cost. And going without for two years.   I guess they traded him because you don’t need to spend as much on receivers with Bryce… or some such bullshit as they thought at the time.   
    • I want to sign him so the excuse can be removed if (when) our offense looks mediocre again.  Supposedly TE is the lone weak spot in our offense.  
    • Broadcast I agree with, he'd be a great color commentator, like the early days of Romo where he was constantly predicting what was about to happen, but I disagree with the pregame part for the same reason as my last post in here.  Pregame is about flash and hyping people up for the games, not granular level specific breakdown of film, which is what Luke does best.   I actually don't think he'd be very good in the pregame role because of that, it's not what he does best and he doesn't have that Gronk/Burleson/etc type of excitement in his presentation style that is needed for those pregame shows.   I almost think he'd actually be best suited to join the Manningcast for some games.  Having him and Peyton breakdown what they're seeing from each side of the ball on the same plays would actually be quite interesting to watch (although admittedly, he might be kinda boring when interviewing the guests there lol)
×
×
  • Create New...