Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So Kellen Mond anyone?


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, 45catfan said:

If we miss out on a QB in the first round, I'd take Davis Mills from Stanford over Kyle Trask...and yes, over Mond.  He's moving up draft boards.  He'll definitely be there in the 2nd, but iffy if we wait until the 3rd round.

Hell be there in the fourth. And I don’t believe in drafting Trask or Mond either. If we don’t get one of the big four we messed up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Varking said:

He’s not worth it in my eyes before round 3. He’s the most inconsistent QB in the SEC the last four years. 

How bout we grab Pitts at 8 and Trask in round 2?  Not kidding.  At worst Trask could be a nice backup here for a long time.  I don't  hate him in round 2 honestly seeing how desperate we are right now.

The way he improved last year was impressive IMO.

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pup McBarky said:

Russell Wilson.

So a lottery ticket. Better to get starters and depth then take a swing on a guy who isn't "your guy". For every Dak Prescott and Russell Wilson there is 10 John David Bootys. 

Edited by Verge
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Verge said:

So a lottery ticket. Better to get starters and depth then take a swing on a guy who isn't "your guy". 

Every pick is a lottery ticket. Some are near guarantees, but none are truly risk-free, not even Lawrence. Russell Wilson is the rationale, not necessarily the explanation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The teams this 2nd year player (can’t really blame the years before he was drafted on him) was playing were going 100% as most do most weeks in the NFL. The whole argument is about his play during that period and how well was he actually playing. I’m with you on the winning though. Just start winning and fans will get excited. Start getting in the playoffs and winning and we won’t care how his PFF or box score stats look. 200 yards a game to 400 yards a game, start scoring and winning playoffs games and 99% of fans will buy in. 
    • Yeah, we are gonna be raw.  Wonnum, for the past 3 years, has been averaging 8 sacks a season (4 in one season when he missed half a season).  I am OK, but yes, they will be thrown to the fire.
    • I like this because it means one or both of the rookies will be thrust into a bigger role right away and we can see what they might be. I don't like this because it just makes our team that much younger and inexperienced.  You need vets to help the young guys learn, I just hope we aren't going too far in the opposite direction.  All our FA signings were guys just coming off their rookie deals too, I get why we're doing it, but having the savvy vets help in other ways too.
×
×
  • Create New...