Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Big Board at #8?


Icege
 Share

Recommended Posts

What's your big board looking like at #8 with the recent moves and news that the first 3 picks will be Lawrence, Wilson, and Jones?

Do you have Fields and Lance at the top? Sewell or Slater ahead of either? Maybe secondary help in the form of Farley or Surtain II? What about grabbing a shiny new weapon in Pitts or a Bama WR?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Reebis21 said:

If we end up going CB, give me JayCee Horn...I don’t know why he somehow defaulted to 3rd best CB...he’s gunna be a force for a longgggg time

Horrendous. Horn is a mediocre athlete that belongs in the second or third round, not the first, and certainly not a top 10 pick. That would be an F- pick for the Panthers.

 

As for the big board top 8, penciling in the top 3:

 

1. Lawrence 

2. Wilson 

3. Jones

 

------

4. Fields

5. Sewell

6. Slater

7. Pitts

8. Chase

 

Parsons would be next man up. 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Smittymoose said:

Horrendous. Horn is a mediocre athlete that belongs in the second or third round, not the first, and certainly not a top 10 pick. That would be an F- pick for the Panthers.

 

As for the big board top 8, penciling in the top 3:

 

1. Lawrence 

2. Wilson 

3. Jones

 

------

4. Fields

5. Sewell

6. Slater

7. Pitts

8. Chase

 

Parsons would be next man up. 

I heard they like Lance why is he not on ur list?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

I heard they like Lance why is he not on ur list?

Because he's not a good QB and is at least a year away. Wasting the cheap years of a rookie QB with a shitty veteran in front of him is stupid, particularly for a team like Carolina that is going to need more than a game manager to be successful next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If no quarterback I would be fine with trading down but more picks don't always guarantee anything looking at the Seahawks drafts.

Staying at 8 based on who we believe will be available Fields/Lance 1a/1b followed by Pitts/Chase and the top OT available. I may find myself in the minority but taking a tackle top 10 is my least favorite scenario in this draft. Multiple reasons for that but this could be the last top 10 pick we see for a bit if we are content at just being mediocre enough to stay middle of the pack and I would rather add more passing weapons to the offense if we can't get a fresh signal caller.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Reebis21 said:

If we end up going CB, give me JayCee Horn...I don’t know why he somehow defaulted to 3rd best CB...he’s gunna be a force for a longgggg time

Horn worries me.  As bad as the Gamecocks were and all the places opponents could attack them....teams didn’t seem to try to avoid Horn.  

 

11 minutes ago, Smittymoose said:

Horrendous. Horn is a mediocre athlete that belongs in the second or third round, not the first, and certainly not a top 10 pick. That would be an F- pick for the Panthers.

 

As for the big board top 8, penciling in the top 3:

 

1. Lawrence 

2. Wilson 

3. Jones

 

------

4. Fields

5. Sewell

6. Slater

7. Pitts

8. Chase

 

Parsons would be next man up. 

Horn is a super great athlete. 

don’t know if he is a great corner.   Opponents didn’t seem that worried about him IMO the little I watched him. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

Horn worries me.  As bad as the Gamecocks were and all the places opponents could attack them....teams didn’t seem to try to avoid Horn.  

 

Horn is a super great athlete. 

don’t know if he is a great corner.   Opponents didn’t seem that worried about him IMO the little I watched him. 

Wrong. I think he'll struggle with NFL-level WRs because his best attribute is being grabby/disrupting WRs at the LOS. His make-up speed is not special, which is concerning for a guy you are going to have to deploy a lot in press man coverage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • we are not talking about the 5th we are talking about bryce being one of if not the worst starter in the nfl for the past 3 years.  Dont move the goalposts my man
    • The issue is the position Bryce plays. Finding a good/great quarterback isn't easy. Plus, it sometimes takes years for these guys to actually become good/great. What you have to look for is progress instead of regression. Bryce has shown that. Can he put it all together? We don't know yet. But that's why you place a smaller bet with the 5th year option, and wait to see. You could be wrong and lose your 30 mil bet, but you didn't hitch your wagon long-term and lose much more.
    • Absolutely not. That’s too much for replacement level player. Bryce may be that. Or he may turn into something more. If you can’t see the flashes, you’re willfully blind. There’s more bad than good right now, but there’s less bad than there was earlier in his career. He’s only 24 and he’s showing signs of improvement. He may never become consistent enough to justify a long term contract, but he’s shown enough to roll the dice on what effectively will turn into a 2 year, $30MM contract for the next two years to see if he can earn something longer.    Sure, in his one season starting, Howell managed to throw for 3,946 yards and toss 21 TDs, but it took throwing the ball an astounding 612 times. He also threw 21 INTs (for a particularly egregious 3.4 INT%). For all the talk of him being a deep ball thrower, he still only averaged 6.4 YPA, with an average air yards of 5.6 yards per attempt. And for all the excuses of Washington’s line giving him no protection (65 sacks taken that year), he was only pressured on 22.7% of his dropbacks, which is a few percentage points lower than what Bryce has had to deal with each year (24.2, 26.7, and 24.0%).    These are all numbers that are at best roughly equivalent to Bryce’s production the past two years. It’s wild to me people can claim so confidently that he’s a better QB. 
×
×
  • Create New...