Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What are we doing in the draft?


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Pup McBarky said:

QB, OL, CB in that order.

I tend to agree. Any other needs? Or those are just a second thought right now...

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, kass said:

I tend to agree. Any other needs? Or those are just a second thought right now...

Plenty. DL, MLB, S, TE. Sure, we signed a couple of stopgaps, but we need more long-term solutions. We'll address most of these in the draft and FA after.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

Let's say Big Mac somehow makes it to 8 and the big 4 are gone. Sewell, Surtain, and Slater are there. What do we do?

Sewell or slater.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, CRA said:

But in the scenario given 5 QBs get drafted before our pick, right?   Chase, Pitts, Sewell, etc all on the board?  I just think they are in a slightly different tier.   It’s not that I don’t like Surtain though.    

This is probably a dumb idea, but if Chase were still on the board at 8, I would have to think long and hard about taking him.  I know, its hardly a position of need, but I think Chase has All-Pro written all over him.

  • Pie 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounding like more and more teams have concerns about Fields' ability to process and make progressions. He looked good in the underwear Olympics, but he may indeed be available when we pick. Of course, if he is Dwayne Haskins Part 2, no thanks. 

  • Pie 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Wolfcop said:

Sounding like more and more teams have concerns about Fields' ability to process and make progressions. He looked good in the underwear Olympics, but he may indeed be available when we pick. Of course, if he is Dwayne Haskins Part 2, no thanks. 

Yeah, well he is an Ohio State QB after all...

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, joemac said:

This is probably a dumb idea, but if Chase were still on the board at 8, I would have to think long and hard about taking him.  I know, its hardly a position of need, but I think Chase has All-Pro written all over him.

That WR corps would be deadly (if we have a QB who can get them the ball). 

Edited by Wolfcop
Edit
  • Pie 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Wolfcop said:

Sounding like more and more teams have concerns about Fields' ability to process and make progressions. He looked good in the underwear Olympics, but he may indeed be available when we pick. Of course, if he is Dwayne Haskins Part 2, no thanks. 

The only thing he and Haskins have in common is the school they played at.

  • Pie 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, ForJimmy said:

The only thing he and Haskins have in common is the school they played at.

Which, historically, has failed to produce any relevant NFL talent.  It is a concern.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Wolfcop said:

That WR corps would be deadly (if we have a QB who can get them the ball). 

Yeah  - Jamar Chase, DJ Moore, Robby Anderson and CMC thrown in for good measure?  Holy hell.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...